Search for: "v. Moore et al" Results 301 - 320 of 389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
  This week's case under review is Modern Holdings, LLC et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:32 am by Lyle Denniston
  But the core issue raised by state officials in their stay application (Tennant, et al., v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am by Sean Wajert
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., et al., 82 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 1996) (applying Hawaii law); Jacobs v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
") After conducting the most thorough judicial review to date of relevant social science on the net public-safety effects of allowing public carriage of guns, Judge Richard Posner in Moore v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am by Miriam Seifter
  (By Supreme Court rule, any party other than the petitioner is deemed a respondent before the Court, so IMLA et al. are technically respondents supporting petitioners.) [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am by INFORRM
Grant et al, 2010 BCSC 682 the claim concerned alleged defamatory statements made by a police officer to the plaintiff’s employer stemming from [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Thus, for instance, Liqun Cao et al, Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am J Crim Just 85, 96 (2002), reports that 35 percent of a representative sample of Cincinnati residents age 21 and above said they would not be willing to shoot a gun at an armed and threatening burglar who had broken into their home. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
The Court refused to hear the appeal brought by the plaintiffs, which consisted of newspaper companies, the ACLU and the Shady Lady Ranch bordello, in Coyote Publishing, Inc. d/b/a High Desert Advocate et al. v. [read post]