Search for: "DOES 1-19" Results 3301 - 3320 of 19,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 4:14 am by Diane Tweedlie
With respect to Article 100(a) EPC, it was argued, inter alia, that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the granted patent lacked novelty with respect to D1 or D2 and that the subject-matter of claim 1 lacked an inventive step with respect to D1 alone or the combination of D1 and D2.VII. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
June 24, 2014).Issues[Whether the district court abused its discretion in] finding that [(1)] the mediator had no duty to disclose his dealings with one of the firms involved in the litigation [such that (2)] relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) was not warranted.CEATS at *3 (text added).Holdings[1] We find that the district court erred in finding that a reasonably objective person would not have wanted to consider circumstances surrounding the Karlseng litigation when deciding… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 12:21 pm by Terry Hart
The big question is, what does this mean for copyright policy? [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 12:21 pm by Terry Hart
The big question is, what does this mean for copyright policy? [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:50 pm by Amy Howe
Writing for a six-justice majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh explained that state and local governments already regulate gifts to officials, and so the federal law “does not supplement those state and local rules by subjecting 19 million state and local officials to up to 10 years in federal prison for accepting even commonplace gratuities. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm by Georgialee Lang
M.T. submitted that the trial judge erred by considering the issue of business expenses from the perspective of s. 19 (1) (g), rather than s. 18 of the Child Support Guidelines. [read post]
Order does not apply at all to: (1) health care operations, which includes hospitals, clinics, laboratories, dentists, pharmacists, medical cannabis dispensaries, veterinary care, etc. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 11:00 am by Jyllian Bradshaw
 The American Rescue Plan Act does not reinstate the mandate to provide leave or require employers to provide any additional leave, but extends the tax credits for qualifying family leave and sick leave wages that an employer voluntarily pays between April 1, 2021 and Sept. 30, 2021. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:34 am by Bianca Saad
The employer of an emergency responder may elect to limit such an employee’s use of SPSL, but at a minimum such an employee may use SPSL to the extent that the employee is unable to work (either at the employee’s customary place of work or telework) because: (1) the employee has been advised by a health care provider to isolate or self-quarantine to prevent the spread of COVID-19; or (2) the employee is experiencing COVID-19 symptoms, is seeking a medical… [read post]
  Return to Work: Prior to returning to work, employees will be required to complete a Confidential Health Form, certifying that the employee does not present a risk of spreading COVID-19 in the workplace. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:53 am by David Cheifetz
See Resurfice at para. 19. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm by David Jacobson
Expand All December 2010 (26) 29: ASX-listed company trading policies 29: Privacy case notes 9-24 of 2010 29: Compliance Training and Procedure Reviews 29: FOI Guidelines 29: APRA consolidates prudential standards 29: Proposed amendments to AML/CTF Rules 29: ASIC guide on insurance for trustee companies 29: Improving financial reports: ASIC’s suggestions 28: Website update 28: Archived Posts Sitemap: Australian Regulatory Compliance Review 21: Looking… [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:33 am by Jason C. Gavejian and Maya Atrakchi
Such calls must meet the following requirements: 1) “the caller must be from a hospital, or be a health care provider, state or local health official, or other government official as well as a person under the express direction of such an organization and acting on its behalf”, and 2) “the content of the call must be solely informational, made necessary because of the COVID-19 outbreak, and directly related to the imminent health or safety risk arising out of the… [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 4005(1) (2010), alleging a course of conduct by Doe that, if proved, could allow a court to grant Blackhouse a protection from abuse order. [read post]