Search for: "A.C."
Results 321 - 340
of 649
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2018, 1:27 pm
Controller A.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
The court was able to infer from this conversation the obvious: the messages were requests by the Defendant for A.C. to engage in both anal and oral sex, which are forms of sexual activity. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
“Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default in responding to defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint (CPLR 5015[a][1]; see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata{display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author{line-height:19px} p.bbpTweet span.metadata span.author img{float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px} p.bbpTweet a:hover{text-decoration:underline}p.bbpTweet span.timestamp{font-size:12px;display:block} Anafinet,… [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:41 am
” However, a month later a Long Island court, in A.C. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:37 am
The High Court and the Court of Appeal refer to guidance on the Article 13(b) exception given by the Supreme Court in Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27; [2012] 1 A.C. 144, including as to the potential relevance of protective measures. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:47 pm
A.C. and E.C. were a couple whose divorce case was an example of this problem. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
” 1 A.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm
It would therefore be inappropriate to grant the mandatory order if the court was of the view that permission would not be given.Permission in this case would depend on consideration of R (on the application of G) v Barnet LBC [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 A.C. 208. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:15 pm
Meanwhile, A.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
., [1944] A.C. 116, which held that: There are two questions involved in the attempt to identify the [plaintiff] as the person defamed. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:49 pm
., [1944] A.C. 116, which held that: “There are two questions involved in the attempt to identify the [plaintiff] as the person defamed. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Defendant again sought vacatur of the reinstated judgment, and over State Farm's opposition this time, Queens Civil vacated the twice reinstated default judgment.The Appellate Term REVERSED and reinstated the default judgment, holding:A party seeking to vacate a default judgment must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; see also Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 12:04 pm
British Railways Board, [1980] A.C. 521 at 541, attributing it to what Lord Denning had said in that case: If material comes into being for a dual purpose – one to find out the cause of the accident – the other to furnish information to the solicitor – it should be disclosed, because it is not then “wholly or mainly” for litigation. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:36 pm
He acknowledged that these hurdles are accepted to be higher than those in American Cyanamid v Ethicon Ltd [1975] A.C. 396 which govern ordinary civil proceedings, and which require the court to ask whether the claimant has an arguable case and, if so, where the balance of convenience lies. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm
It would therefore be inappropriate to grant the mandatory order if the court was of the view that permission would not be given.Permission in this case would depend on consideration of R (on the application of G) v Barnet LBC [2003] UKHL 57, [2004] 2 A.C. 208. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 10:30 pm
The court referred to Santam Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk v Byleveldt 1973 (2) SA 146 (A) and the English case of Parry v Cleaver 1970 A.C. 1, and quoted Lord Reid: “It would be revolting to the ordinary person’s sense of justice, and therefore contrary to public policy, that the sufferer should have their damages reduced so that they could gain nothing from the benevolence of friends or relatives or of the public at large and that the only gainer would be the wrongdoer. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 1:10 pm
Mom and Dad decided that their daughter, A.C., should go live with the father in Pasco County right away, and both parents signed a “private agreement” to that effect. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 2:16 pm
Chetdy, [1916] 1 A.C. 603 (P.C.), cited by Allen J. in Harshenin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 10:47 pm
Patent No. 4,972,181 ("A.C. [read post]
