Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc."
Results 3381 - 3400
of 3,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2007, 9:36 am
The requirements of this paragraph shall not apply to original enactments of codifications of law. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
Clothing Collection, Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
” The Court in Mitchell allowed an infringement suit against the downstream users, though the case is somewhat peculiar because the infringement arose after the original patent term had been extended, when the license terms extended only to the end of the original patent term.) [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 8:31 pm
Washington Mutual Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:32 pm
In re Thor Tech, Inc., Serial No. 78487208 (October 31, 2007) [precedential].Section 1(b)(2) requires that an application "include specification ... of the goods. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 2006 WL 2819046, at *9 (D.N.J. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:47 am
The SCOPE court then applied these general principles to the case at hand. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:47 am
The SCOPE court then applied these general principles to the case at hand. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
However, they are run through a tabulator, which saves almost all of the time, effort, and expense of an initial hand count.[15]However, each of these systems are vulnerable in many ways to the same problems that occurred in Florida: poor ballot design. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
But the failure to provide such warning would not result in liability if the plaintiff, not being warned, kept her job and lost a hand in a job-related machine accident. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
As the courtroom saga unfolds, M&A players and practitioners should keep a watchful eye – not since In re IBP Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 4:21 pm
Rockefeller's commitment to getting the telecoms out of court surprises some who remember that Rockefeller was originally disturbed enough about the secret spying programs that he hand-wrote a letter to Dick Cheney in 2003, expressing his concerns about the program's legality. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 6:10 am
Health Coalition, Inc., 687 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 6:10 am
Health Coalition, Inc., 687 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Under John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 11:24 am
In CBOCS West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:44 pm
Pickwick originally only had the trademark.[29] The owner of the trademark selected clothes which would appeal to the younger generations and put the trademark on the clothes. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
See Lexecon Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 2:03 am
On the other hand, size is not necessarily proof that one will have competent staff. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 1:59 am
Swift Invs., Inc., 260 F.3d 1251, 1256 (11th Cir. 2001) ("The cumulative effect of these citations is persuasive. . . . [read post]
