Search for: "Federal Savings Bank, The" Results 3421 - 3440 of 4,901
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The act of breaking into and entering into the offices of the Government and public authorities, or the offices of banks, banking houses, saving banks, trust companies, insurance companies, or other buildings not dwellings with intent to commit a felony therein. 10. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am by The Complex Litigator
As we have said, a federal statute’s saving clause “ ‘cannot in reason be construed as [allowing] a common law right, the continued existence of which would be absolutely inconsistent with the provisions of the act. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:12 pm by Mandelman
Originally posted in October 2010… Re-posted at request of readers. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Embezzlement of funds of a bank of deposit or savings bank, or trust company chartered under Federal or State laws, where the amount of money embezzled is not less than two hundred dollars. 17. [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  That would bring such bans within the savings clause of section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, as Justice Thomas interpreted it. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:58 pm by Kevin Funnell
My client’s program would have saved the bank if [the OCC] allowed it, but they didn’t. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The act of breaking into and entering the offices of the Government and public authorities, or the offices of banks, banking houses, savings banks, trust companies, [insurance and other companies,] or other buildings not dwellings with intent to commit a felony therein. 11. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
The White House billed it as “saving Social Security first,” viewing the surplus as an opportunity to shore up the nation’s finances before huge numbers of the baby boom generation began claiming federal retirement benefits. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:24 pm by Mandelman
The Other Side of the Issue… From what I can discern from talking to various involved parties, the consensus is that any bill that requires the banks or mortgage servicers to even discuss the issue of proper chain of title as being part of the foreclosure process is unquestionably doomed to failure in Arizona’s House of Representatives and therefore, there is no point in sending such a bill to the House… it is nothing more than an exercise in futility. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:10 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
But homes were saved and families were preserved with a chance to start over. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:59 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
  After granting certiorari, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempted the Discover Bank rule. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 8:37 am by Larry Ribstein
The case involved the application of Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 6:27 am
People who have worked very hard and poured a lot of financial resources into saving their homes should have the right to assurance that the bank means what it says -- and they should be able to hold the bank accountable when it goes back on promises. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:25 pm
Dual tracking is popular with banks because they believe it saves time, and therefore money, by getting started with the lengthy foreclosure process early. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
Lederle Laboratories, 732 P.2d 297 (Idaho 1987), a vaccine case, the state’s highest court answered some certified questions from a federal court of appeals.As an aside, we have serious qualms about the psychology of certified questions. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:56 pm
”While acknowledging that unconscionability is a generally applicable doctrine of contract law, Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, concluded that Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California’s Discover Bank rule.Individual v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:08 pm by Steven G. Pearl
. ----, 2011 WL 1561956 (4/27/11), which concerns whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts California's Discover Bank unconscionability analysis of class action waivers in arbitration agreements. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Daniel O'Rielly
Concepcion, reversing the Ninth Circuit opinion below and holding that California's Discover Bank rule is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. [read post]