Search for: "DOES 1-19"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 19,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2012, 9:39 am
§§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(C), a penalty section that carries no mandatory minimum. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
Jackson Slip op. at 2, n. 1. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:19 pm
Neither one, however, made it in on the November 2012 ballot because neither received the necessary 385,000 signatures required by the July 19, 2012 deadline. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:24 am
The provisions are applicable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:28 am
The provisions are applicable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:24 am
The provisions are applicable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
The bill does not have a sunset date, so essential employees who contract COVID-19 in the future will receive the benefit of the bill’s presumption with respect to their workers’ compensation claims as well. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Why Does This Matter? [read post]
21 Sep 2024, 2:08 pm
On 17 August 2022, Drifa ehf. filed an application for revocation due to non-use based on Article 58(1)(a) EUTMR. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 11:45 am
This may be the case even if the wage income indicated in item # 1 of the Form 1040 may be sufficient. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:31 pm
" See, supra, Fact Nos. 15, 17, 18 and 19 in Part I.B.1.b. of this Decision and Order (emphasis added). [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:37 am
PDO ‘Morbier’ (to the left) and ‘Montboissié du Haut Livradois’ (to the right)The Court of Appeal of Paris affirmed that the PDO does not protect the appearance of a product or its characteristics as described in the specification, but only the PDO’s name. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 8:44 am
Yet the QALY does not seem to enter into discussions of COVID-19. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:48 pm
Please note that this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:56 am
Further, it is retroactive to March 1, 2020. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
The wording does make reference to “the physical condition of the workplace”. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 12:47 pm
If your employer does so, then that retaliation can be a separate and additional basis for suing and winning an award of damages. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:48 am
The Court’s opinion brings the EPSLA and EFMLEA in line with the existing FMLA, which does not require employer consent. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
The wording does make reference to “the physical condition of the workplace”. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm
This does not apply to drivers who qualify for either of the short-haul exceptions in 395.1(e)(1) or (2). [read post]
