Search for: ""Dewsnup v. Timm" OR "502 U.S. 410""
Results 21 - 25
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992). [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:46 am
” The Court reasoned that Congress must have had a full understanding of the pre-Code rule that liens pass through the bankruptcy unaffected, and, “given the ambiguity in the text, the Court was not convinced that Congress intended to depart from that rule. 502 U.S. 410, 112 S. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:31 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
It is United States v. [read post]
