Search for: ""Mapp v. Ohio" OR "367 U.S. 643""
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm
In a case known as Mapp v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure case, and Texas v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), on June 19, 1961 with a 6-3 vote. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:05 pm
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 656 (1961) (quoting Wolf v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, that the Supreme Court applied the rule to state law enforcement officers, as well. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 685 (1961). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
— (2009) and Arizona v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:54 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), which applied the exclusionary rule to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:59 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:04 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), says that citizens shall not be stopped in their cars, or otherwise without probable cause or reasonable suspicion to believe that a crime has been committed. [read post]
OH11: Judicial intergrity justifies exclusion; warrantless entry for noise complaint was unjustified
10 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
Ohio (1961), 367 U.S. 643: "There are those who say, as did Justice (then Judge) Cardozo, that under our constitutional exclusionary doctrine '[t]he criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered.' People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:05 pm
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), by application of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:24 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655-57, 6 L. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 5:01 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1981). [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 11:09 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 659 (1961) (quoting People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 7:07 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 (1961). [read post]
