Search for: "ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ"
Results 21 - 40
of 175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2020, 3:30 am
I've also enjoyed hearing from so many of you about your own trial experiences and other take-aways from the interviews.Season 2 is already in the works and we plan on launching sometime in mid-January with the premiere episode with Alan Dershowitz. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:48 pm
” In his book of the same name, Alan Dershowitz said the concept is more easily demonstrated than defined. [read post]
14 May 2020, 10:54 am
“Judges Are Umpires, Not Ringmasters; Sullivan invites outsiders to weigh in on the Flynn case — an unconstitutional judicial power grab”: Law professor Alan M. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
If something out of the ordinary took place (“The Court has considered the Book of Revelations, the legal theories of Alan Dershowitz, and the screenplay for that Black Mirror episode about the pig”), then that should probably be disclosed. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
And who can forget the shocking theory offered by Trump’s impeachment attorney Alan Dershowitz, who said that even if a President tries to cheat to win an election, that is not impeachable if the President thinks that his election is for the good of the country? [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Scotland Scottish Legal News has a piece by Julie Hamilton, “Defamation, social media and the right to insult” United States Lawyer Alan Dershowitz has issued libel proceedings against another lawyer, David Boies accusing him of carrying out a “war of defamation” and “engaging in a sustained campaign to subvert the judicial process for purposes of disseminating outrageous, knowingly false and defamatory claims accusing Dershowitz of… [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am
(Of course, Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman have provided legal analyses that the Emoluments Clause simply doesn't apply to the President at all, an argument I'm certainly not persuaded by, though I don't regard it as "frivolous" in a way, say, that is true of Alan Dershowitz's argument about Trump's ability to do anything and everything he thinks benefits his election prospects.) [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
But, look, I’m not interested.PUTIN: Are you sure? [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:52 pm
Republicans in fact drew back from some of Alan Dershowitz’s more extreme assertions along this line. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 5:45 am
Sort of the converse of an Alan Dershowitz argument, since those tend to be utterly stupid, yet somehow appallingly successful. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 5:45 am
Sort of the converse of an Alan Dershowitz argument, since those tend to be utterly stupid, yet somehow appallingly successful. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:15 pm
But it surely amounts to “criminal-like conduct”—as Alan Dershowitz describes the impeachable offense. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
" This is a source of almost endless mischief, as seen most clearly in Alan Dershowitz's lifeline to Trumpistas. [read post]
The problematics of impeachment (I): The specific problems of Charles Black's take on the presidency
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
Like Mark Tushnet (I think), I'm really skeptical. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Wrote M. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:59 am
" -- Alan M. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:24 am
"From "Alan Dershowitz’s Strange Constitutional Arguments on Impoundment and Foreign Policy" by Philip Bobbitt (Lawfare).If we take Bobbitt's approach to heart, everything depends on what Trump had in his mind. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 9:48 am
On Jan. 17, the White House announced that Alan Dershowitz would be joining the president’s defense team in his Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 6:51 am
I'm going to approach the specific argument indirectly, beginning with Alan Dershowitz's now notorious "Alaska" hypothetical.As a reminder, here's the hypothetical: "Assume Putin decides to 'retake' Alaska, the way he 'retook' Crimea. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 6:48 am
” In other words, it's a legal brief.Savage quotes Alan Dershowitz, who concedes that "most" scholars say a crime is not necessary: "My argument will be very serious and very scholarly. [read post]
