Search for: "AS PTO, LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, limited to the following question: Whether inter partes review—an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to analyze the... [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
True Health Diagnostics LLC (Fed. [read post]
4 May 2007, 11:05 am
Orion IP, LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Last Best Beef, LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 5:05 am
Hoover, attorney, Davis McGrath LLC, Chicago, Illinois.Brett Tolpin, attorney, Welsh & Katz, Ltd., Chicago, Illinois.Ronald D. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
Elle Belle, LLC, Cancellation No. 92042991, 85 USPQ2d 1090 (TTAB Apr. 9, 2007) [precedential]; Hurley Int'l LLC v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:31 pm
Copyright © Nipper, LLC 2004-2007. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 12:29 am
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts faced the opposite question in the In re Coldwave Systems, LLC case. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:34 pm
Greene's Energy Group, LLC, Docket No. 16-712, J. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
Interactive Games LLC—that DraftKings’ proposed combination of prior art would have been obvious when Interactive Games’ mobile gambling patent was filed and was therefore unpatentable. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
Interactive Games LLC—that DraftKings’ proposed combination of prior art would have been obvious when Interactive Games’ mobile gambling patent was filed and was therefore unpatentable. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
Interactive Games LLC—that DraftKings’ proposed combination of prior art would have been obvious when Interactive Games’ mobile gambling patent was filed and was therefore unpatentable. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
Interactive Games LLC—that DraftKings’ proposed combination of prior art would have been obvious when Interactive Games’ mobile gambling patent was filed and was therefore unpatentable. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
Interactive Games LLC—that DraftKings’ proposed combination of prior art would have been obvious when Interactive Games’ mobile gambling patent was filed and was therefore unpatentable. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:00 pm
Interactive Games LLC—that DraftKings’ proposed combination of prior art would have been obvious when Interactive Games’ mobile gambling patent was filed and was therefore unpatentable. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:15 am
Fusilamp, LLC v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 10:17 am
Bethesda Softworks LLC, 12-1509-LPS-CJB, et al. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
In re Phillips Farms, LLC, Serial No. 78669171 (March 26, 2008) [not precedential].Syrah grapesThe PTO first squashed Applicant's argument that the case was not ripe for appeal: the subject application was filed under Section (1)(b) and, since a specimen of use had not yet been filed, the PTO incorrectly "conducted a preliminary review and found that the mark PETIT-PETITE is descriptive for wine, all wines, in all market conditions, absent the realities of the… [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 10:45 am
Global Tubing, LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 6:44 am
TWC Administration LLC, May 4, 2015, Snyder, C.). [read post]
