Search for: "Antenna Systems, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2014, 10:15 am
Amicus briefs have been filed by patent lawyers for multiple organizations, including AARP, Amazon.com, Inc.,  Cisco Systems, Inc., Dell Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.) that held that cable systems’ retransmissions of over-the-air broadcasts were not public performances under the Copyright Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.) that held that cable systems’ retransmissions of over-the-air broadcasts were not public performances under the Copyright Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.) that held that cable systems’ retransmissions of over-the-air broadcasts were not public performances under the Copyright Act. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:41 pm by Orly Lobel
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. (1974) the Supreme Court ruled that cable providers were rabbit ear antennas which did not infringe on broadcasters’ copyrights. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:49 am by Barry Sookman
Aereo had tried to architect its television restransmission system to avoid paying copyright royalties or license fees by “renting” dime sized antennae to subscribers. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am by Devlin Hartline
With Aereo’s upcoming oral argument before the Supreme Court, I’ve got tens of thousands of tiny antennae on the mind. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 12:18 pm by Frank Montero
During oral argument, Chief Justice Roberts questioned the motives underlying the design of Aereo’s system: “There’s no reason for you to have 10,000 dime-sized antennas except to get around copyright laws. . . [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:51 pm by Sixth Sense Law
Aereo’s system uses dime-sized antennas to pick up over-the-air television signals at subscriber request. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:42 am by Jim Singer
 Aereo’s system uses antennas and a remote hard drive to create individual copies of the programs. [read post]
29 May 2016, 7:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiff must show that “a good faith effort has been made to evaluate less intrusive alternatives, which includes considerations of alternative sites, alternative tower designs, placement of antenna on existing structures, and ‘alternative system designs. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:03 am by Lyle Denniston
   Whether that would still make use of the system of small antennas, taking TV programs off the airwaves, is not clear at this point. [read post]