Search for: "BOX 20, INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2021, 7:38 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board had sufficient evidence to find that two box designs for electric cables and wire to prevent tangling submitted by applicant Reelex Packaging Solutions, Inc. were functional and not entitled to trademark protection as trade dress, the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2009, 7:59 pm
All of them were acquitted of 20 securities fraud charges during a previous trial in 2007. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
The Wall Street Journal reports that HCA Holdings, Inc., a large for-profit hospital network including 160 hospitals, 115 surgery centers, and spanning 20 states, has prohibited use of power morcellation in laparoscopic uterine surgery, according to an email from a spokesperson on Tuesday. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:52 pm
Further investigation revealed that Foodmaker, Inc., parent company of Jack in the Box, had been warned by local health departments and its own employees that its hamburgers were being undercooked, but had decided that cooking them to the required 155 degrees made them too tough. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:33 pm
The products subject to recall have a "BEST BEFORE OR FREEZE BY" date of "11/13/11" and "EST. 245C" on the box label. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 pm
Further to our May 23, 2011 post, on June 24, 2011, ALJ Gildea issued the public version of the Initial Determination (“ID”) (dated May 20, 2011) in Certain Digital Set-Top Boxes and Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:15 pm
A Brooklyn, New York, company that sold ingredients to Daniele International Inc. has recalled all of the crushed red pepper that it sold in 25-pound boxes since April 6, 2009. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:47 pm
Supreme Court, Feb. 24, 2022, Unicolors, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Boxed, Inc., [1] the Delaware Court of Chancery held that a stockholder vote was invalid under Section 242 of Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) where a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) had a multi-class stock structure and Class A and Class B stockholders voted together as a single class on charter amendments to increase the number of shares. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Boxed, Inc., [1] the Delaware Court of Chancery held that a stockholder vote was invalid under Section 242 of Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) where a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) had a multi-class stock structure and Class A and Class B stockholders voted together as a single class on charter amendments to increase the number of shares. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Although Section 1402 of the Abandoned Property Law has a $20 threshold for such listing, the Comptroller uses a "$50 threshold” for the listings on his Internet website. [read post]
statutory ban on nonfunctional slack fill doesn't show misleadingness/materiality as a matter of law
13 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Welch Foods Inc., 2022 WL 18228293, No.: SACV 20-01859-CJC (JDEx) (C.D. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:59 am
"-10- and 20-pound boxes of "W.B. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
SLICED BEEF" 10 lb. boxes of "Huntington Meat VEAL PATTY" 10 lb. boxes of "Imperial Meat VEAL PATTY" 10 lb. boxes of "El Rancho VEAL PATTY" 20 lb. boxes of "Huntington Meat VEAL PATTY" 20 lb. boxes of "Imperial Meat VEAL PATTY" 20 lb. boxes of "El Rancho VEAL PATTY" [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:15 am
GROUND BEEF PATTY” 20 lb. boxes of “IMPERIAL MEAT CO. [read post]
25 May 2009, 9:48 am
Here is a (belated) update on some of the debt buyer lawsuits filed in the state of Alabama during the week of April 20, 2009. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 10:02 pm
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
Because respondent was "under no obligation to furnish [materials that he did] not possess" (Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648, 649 [3d Dept 2000]; see generally Matter of Council of City of N.Y. v Bloomberg, 6 NY3d 380, 388 [2006]), the evidence submitted by respondent "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations" with respect to the cotton swabs in evidence box number seven, thereby "conclusively… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
Because respondent was "under no obligation to furnish [materials that he did] not possess" (Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648, 649 [3d Dept 2000]; see generally Matter of Council of City of N.Y. v Bloomberg, 6 NY3d 380, 388 [2006]), the evidence submitted by respondent "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations" with respect to the cotton swabs in evidence box number seven, thereby "conclusively… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
Because respondent was "under no obligation to furnish [materials that he did] not possess" (Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648, 649 [3d Dept 2000]; see generally Matter of Council of City of N.Y. v Bloomberg, 6 NY3d 380, 388 [2006]), the evidence submitted by respondent "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations" with respect to the cotton swabs in evidence box number seven, thereby "conclusively… [read post]
