Search for: "BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
Circuit denied various motions to intervene or for reconsideration of motions to intervene as follows: The motion of the plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:46 am
Healthfirst Inc. et al. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Cooper, et al. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
For contractors who often subject to one or more of federal environmental laws or regulations, below is a brief report on some the significant environmental law and administrative cases decided since late June of 2015 by jurisdiction: District of Columbia Energy Future Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted a petition filed by the defense contractor Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit--has gone on to also address the other half of the RFRA equation: the D.C. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
His right originates in an act of congress passed in February, 1801, concerning the district of Columbia. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The Commission is a body created under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (Act), as amended, 18 U.S.C. 3551 et seq. (1982 ed., Supp. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Brown, et al. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Department of Homeland Security, et al.) [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:43 pm
On March 6, 2014, the District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion in United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:44 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
California, 11-290) argued that the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm
Atwood et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
The Second District reversed the trial court. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
