Search for: "CSX Corporation, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 9:39 am
Quality Stores, Inc., No. 10-1563 (6th Cir. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:10 pm
In 2008, a different court went the other way on the issue, ruling that CSX Corporation was liable for FICA taxes on severance packages. [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:15 pm
At the TaxProf Blog, Paul Caron has this post on the Court's decision to grant certiorari in CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 11:49 pm
This particular case was brought on behalf of a woman, diagnosed with mesothelioma, who claimed that she had been exposed to asbestos by her husband's employer, CSX Transportation Inc. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:00 am
Posted by HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Friday, September 8, 2017 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of September 1–7, 2017. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 8:21 am
"
CORPORATE UPDATE:
Corporate SecuritiesThursday, July 17, 2008By John C. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
If that sounds familiar, it might be because a previous iteration – CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 10:56 am
CSX Transp., Inc., Tennessee Personal Injury Blog, May 11, 2016. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:38 am
Commissioner, No. 06-1286 (trust administration fees) CSX Transportation Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
("CTI"), and CTI PET Systems, Inc. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:01 pm
NACCO Industries Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 4:36 pm
(in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of Cruise Lines International Association (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of United Maritime Group, LLC (in support of petitioners) __________________ Docket: 08-269 Title: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
CSX Corporation, No. 110662 -- Does an employer owe a tort duty of due care to the immediate family of its employees? [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 2:21 pm
CSX Transp., Inc., 202 F.R.D. 464 (W.D. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am
CSX Transp., Inc., 597 F.3d 474, 486 (1st Cir.2010), an expert must still show that the steps taken as part of that analysis—the “ruling out” and the “ruling in” of causes—were accomplished utilizing scientifically valid methods. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am
CSX Transp., Inc., 597 F.3d 474, 486 (1st Cir.2010), an expert must still show that the steps taken as part of that analysis—the “ruling out” and the “ruling in” of causes—were accomplished utilizing scientifically valid methods. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am
CSX Transp., Inc., 597 F.3d 474, 486 (1st Cir.2010), an expert must still show that the steps taken as part of that analysis—the “ruling out” and the “ruling in” of causes—were accomplished utilizing scientifically valid methods. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Opinion below (2nd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition __________________ Docket: 07-606 Case name: John Carlo, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The following is a list of some of the UBS Reverse Convertible Notes offered: CUSIP Issuer Product Name 90261J426 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Starbucks Corp. 90261J434 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Intel Corp. 90261J459 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Apple, Inc. 90261J319 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked linked to Occidental Petroleum Corp.… [read post]
