Search for: "Chevron Intellectual Property"
Results 21 - 40
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Matal As a Case Study in Chevron Deference and Administrative Law (Source: SSRN) Amy Shim: To Patent or Not to Patent: How to Protect Your Company’s Intellectual Property (Source: All Business) New Job Postings on Patently-O: The John Marshall Law School Christopher & Weisberg, PA Daly, Crowley, Mofford & Durkee, LLP Holland & Hart 2SPL Harrity & Harrity Roberts Mlotkowski Safran Cole & Calderon, P.C. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 9:15 am
Loyal readers know that trademark rights are dynamic, use-it-or-lose-it intellectual property rights. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
§ 365(g) — terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor’s breach under applicable non-bankruptcy law; and (2) whether an exclusive right to sell certain products practicing a patent in a particular geographic territory is a “right to intellectual property” within the meaning of Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Justice Gorsuch was nominated in part because he condemned Chevron on the Tenth Circuit, and other conservative judges including Justice Kavanaugh have quickly joined the anti-Chevron trend. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 12:15 pm
Ninth Circuit: The feds' interpretation is entitled to Chevron deference. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:14 am
It will be interesting to see what impact a Justice Kavanaugh (or whoever becomes the ultimate replacement for Justice Kennedy) will have on the USPTO and intellectual property issues in general. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:49 am
Stimart, a Director in the Gibbons Intellectual Property Department, and Jean E. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am
If patent holders at large had cared a lot about SAS, more of them than just the Intellectual Property Owners Association (amicus brief, PDF) would have chimed in. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
The CDA also expressly states that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property” and that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section.[12] The California court’s reasons for finding that Google had a likelihood of success on the merits was expressed as follows: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act… [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 11:25 am
Intellectual property law is historically part of American private law. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
The CDA also expressly states that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property” and that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
According to the publishers, these changes altered the meaning of the song but the plaintiffs claim that the changes are superficial and note that the rest of the lyrics as well as the music are the same. 3: Cheerleader Copyright Case Ends in Settlement Finally today, World Intellectual Property Review reports that the Star Athletica lawsuit has ended not with a bang, but with a very unusual settlement that only sees one side agreeing to the terms. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
For example, in In re Chevron Intellectual Property Grp. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
Camp’s article The Play’s the Thing: A Theory of Taxing Virtual Worlds was cited in the following article: Linda Beale, Reining in Intellectual Property Tax Avoidance, 2017 TXN MAGAZINE 26-38. 21. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:39 pm
From this history of failed legislation petitioner reasons that Congress intends to channel intellectual property claims for industrial design into design patents. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:09 am
It is not the property of those who control the media. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
Nicholas Krob is an Intellectual Property Attorney in the Litigation Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:22 am
” Protection for fashion designs is a hotly contested topic because such designs do not fit neatly into any form of intellectual property under U.S. laws. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
It had been used in intellectual property cases to dismiss lawsuits not filed quickly. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:31 pm
I am sure that my colleagues who study intellectual property will write at length for years to come about the doctrinal nuances of the court’s discussion of the separability requirement, which seems to me a marked shift from most of the prior treatments. [read post]
