Search for: "Company 123" Results 21 - 40 of 991
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
In addition, not all of these laws will be applicable to every company. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
 Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:44 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court has overturned the preliminary injunction issued by the Munich local division against NanoString in its conflict with US biotech company 10xGenomics. [read post]
” However, conflict may arise wherein the entity that invented the AI system is different from the entity (company or person) that is taking the measures to apply for an application for that AI-generated invention. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Hannah Zhao
For those currently under ICE’s EM surveillance, their experience is primarily dictated by a single company: BI Incorporated, from whom ICE has purchased all its EM infrastructure since 2004. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:17 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
’ Last week, the epi wrote on its website: ‘epi, together with other associations and companies has called upon MEPs to reconsider the proposed amendment to ban patents on NGT plants, because without adequate protection, companies in Europe will not be able to invest in NGTs, the pace of innovation will slow down and the EU’s goal of fostering competitiveness with stronger biotechnology contributions will be put at risk. [read post]
As a consequence of this new definition, independent companies having concluded a license agreement should normally not be regarded as “economically linked” and should thus be able to each obtain one SPC for the same product on the basis of their respective patents, which is a sensible clarification. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Through Sept. 30, 2023, for instance, special-purpose acquisition company-related suits had fallen 37% as compared to the same period in 2022. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
For companies such as Kinky S Dolls, the brothels are the equivalent to road tests for prospective owners of anthropomorphic bots that can cost $3,000 each. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
But if these patents are all invalid, then this really harms the company’. [read post]
And Chinese companies are setting the record in solar cell photoelectric conversion efficiency 56 times, having filed 126,400 patent applications in this field. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:03 am by David Lynn
He noted that companies should have a basis for their claims and should address the impact on the company in terms of its results of operations and financial condition. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:32 am by Rebekka Thomas (Bristows)
On 19 December 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in The NOCO Company v Shenzhen Carku Technology Co., Ltd  [2023] EWCA Civ 1502. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The Claimant submitted that the Defendant should have included contextual facts such as Dyson already being a global company whose centre of operations was in Asia and that the practical significance of the relocation to Singapore was minor [123]. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 1:24 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
’ More on the court in number 6: UPC grants 10x Genomics preliminary injunction, NanoString appeals, a September article analysing the UPC’s decision to grant ‘US biotech company 10x Genomics a preliminary injunction against rival NanoString. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
Recall that Section 3 extended to any "person… who, having previously taken an oath, … as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States" and subsequently engaged in insurrection.123 Thus, no one doubts that executive officers in the Southern states—for example, South Carolina—who had taken an oath prior to the rebellion, were covered by Section 3. [read post]
The US company appealed the decision but the SPC eventually upheld the Guangzhou Court’s ruling, thereby solidifying its precedents in Oppo vs. [read post]