Search for: "Continental Casualty Co Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am by MBettman
(“LGR”), from Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”), which was effective from May 12, 2010 through May 12, 2011. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
Continental Casualty Co., a unanimous three-judge panel found that Philadelphia Common Pleas Judge Allan L. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
JJB Brokerage moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, and four of the five insurers moved for summary judgment under the following policies:   Continental Casualty Company -- business auto policy to Joseph Picone & Son, Inc. [read post]
Valley Forge Insurance Company and Continental Casualty Co., Case No. 15-14135-FDS (D. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:11 am by Kelly Faglioni
Valley Forge Insurance Company and Continental Casualty Co., Case No. 15-14135-FDS (D. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:51 am by K&L Gates
Continental Casualty Co., addressed the scope of an insurer’s duty to defend and indemnify a contractor for faulty workmanship claims under a CGL policy. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:00 am
John Canova, defendant-appellee NEW YORK COUNTYInsurance Law Company's Insurers May Be Liable for Limitless Coverage in over 20,000 Asbestos-Related Claims Continental Casualty Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 5:42 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Mid-Continental Casualty Co., the Texas Supreme Court found that in the context of an insured's claim for a defense, the insured needs to provide the insurer with the statements or invoices for legal services that the insured receives in order to trigger the statutory deadlines. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 2:13 am
[www.nylj.com] Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted: APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTProducts LiablityClaims on Firm's Asbestos Insulation Subject To Products Liability Coverage, Aggregate Limit Continental Casualty Co., plaintiffs-appellants-respondents v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The complaints assert that conspiring brokers funneled unwitting clients to their co-conspirator insurers, which were insulated from competition; in return, the insurers awarded the brokers contingent commission payments—concealed from the insurance purchasers and surreptitiously priced into insurance premiums—based on the volume of premium dollars steered their way. [read post]