Search for: "Coty Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2017, 6:40 am
Coty Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:21 am
NARB Chips Away at Sally Hansen Claims The National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) has recommended that Coty Inc. discontinue claims that its Sally Hansen Miracle Gel Nail Polish provides “up to 14 days of color & shine. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:21 am
NARB Chips Away at Sally Hansen Claims The National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) has recommended that Coty Inc. discontinue claims that its Sally Hansen Miracle Gel Nail Polish provides “up to 14 days of color & shine. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:37 am
Coty, 264 U.S. 359, 368 (1924). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:13 am
Coty, 264 U.S. 359 (1924), its disclaimer was enough to inform consumers that it repackaged or changed the original. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 7:16 am
” Sally Hansen Maker to Appeal NAD Recommendation Related to Gel Polish Claims The NAD has recommend that Coty, Inc., discontinue certain claims related to its Sally Hansen Miracle Gel, including a claim that the product produces a result equivalent to a salon gel manicure. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 7:16 am
” Sally Hansen Maker to Appeal NAD Recommendation Related to Gel Polish Claims The NAD has recommend that Coty, Inc., discontinue certain claims related to its Sally Hansen Miracle Gel, including a claim that the product produces a result equivalent to a salon gel manicure. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:36 am
Coty challenged the photographs, saying they were heavily manipulated and the tests were unsubstantiated. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 8:51 am
AND CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
| OHIM’s rebranding | LV’s pattern as trade mark | EPO and trade unions | Patent and first-mover advantage | Libraries’ right to digitise their collection in Germany.Never too late 42 [week ending on Sunday 19 April] – WIPO Roving Seminars in Israel | Foster v Svenson, or "of taking pictures of your neighbours" | Trade marks and social networks | Jan Rosen on CJEU's public criterion to assess whether linking amounts communication to the… [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
| OHIM’s rebranding | LV’s pattern as trade mark | EPO and trade unions | Patent and first-mover advantage | Libraries’ right to digitise their collection in Germany.Never too late 42 [week ending on Sunday 19 April] – WIPO Roving Seminars in Israel | Foster v Svenson, or "of taking pictures of your neighbours" | Trade marks and social networks | Jan Rosen on CJEU's public criterion to assess whether linking amounts communication to the… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 42 [week ending on Sunday 19 April] – WIPO Roving Seminars in Israel | Foster v Svenson, or "of taking pictures of your neighbours" | Trade marks and social networks | Jan Rosen on CJEU's public criterion to assess whether linking amounts communication to the public | EU Commission's misinformation about UPC | Dior v (Sirous) Dior | Lyricists and copyright | Banking secrecy v IP rights in… [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
* AG Cruz Villalon says that (absolute) banking secrecy prevents effective enforcement of IP rightsEleonora reports on AG's Villalon's Opinion in Coty Germany, C-580/13, a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressing the balance between banking secrecy and IP enforcement. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Last week was the busiest in the IPKat's history, with a total of 29 blogposts. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 11:08 pm
Also, Bath & Body Works Brand Management, Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 4:15 am
Public Securities Offerings Coty, Inc.: As discussed here, on February 13, 2014, a plaintiff filed a securities class action lawsuit in the Southern District of New York against Coty, Inc., certain of its directors and officers and its offering underwriters relating to the company’s June 13, 2013 initial public offering. [read post]
