Search for: "D. Hartman" Results 21 - 40 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Texas Supreme Court recently provided pointed guidance to litigants seeking attorney’s fees in a fee-shifting setting. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:55 am by Bob Ambrogi
— Eddie Hartman (@EddieRHartman) November 11, 2019 Start your own firm, borrow a bunch of money. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm by Guest Blogger
For the symposium on Lawrence Lessig, Fidelity and Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2019).I am grateful to Jack Balkin and the Balkinization blog for the careful and powerful collection of review essays based on my book Fidelity & Constraint (2019). [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 10:41 am by Daniel Shaviro
But the new view (dating from a 1985 paper by David Hartman that drew on earlier work, regarding classical double corporate income taxation, by the likes of David Bradford, Alan Auerbach, Mervyn King, and William Andrews) showed that under certain conditions this is false. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This recent “D&O Diary” blog says that the securities class action bar has latched on to Elon Musk’s ill-considered tweetstorm. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
, Kavanaugh joined an opinion holding that a police reserve officer’s emails to his superiors, in which he cc’d his co-workers, were not protected under the balancing test adopted by the Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 11:37 am by Daniel Shaviro
Although the supposed rationale for the holiday was "just this once, and never again," there were many people who believed that there'd be another one soon. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
., 292 F.3d 1139, 1156 (9th Cir. 2002) (affirming award of $2,308,000 in attorneys’ fees to defendant where plaintiff asserted groundless false advertising claim); Hartman v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
., 292 F.3d 1139, 1156 (9th Cir. 2002) (affirming award of $2,308,000 in attorneys’ fees to defendant where plaintiff asserted groundless false advertising claim); Hartman v. [read post]