Search for: "D. L.R. C." Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
” For example, the court could give effect to a document that might purport to be a last will, but might not be witnessed by two witnesses, or perhaps the deceased person might not even have signed it.I have written about this new provision before, but for convenience, I will set out section 58 here:Court order curing deficiencies58  (1) In this section, "record" includes data that(a) is recorded or stored electronically, (b) can be read by a person, and (c)… [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Alice Woolley
L.R. (5th) 1, 2011 ABCA 94 at paras 23-29; leave to SCC denied, [2011] SCCA No. 260 (QL). [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
He tried to act on that intention but was frustrated by being unable to locate his former solicitor;  c) Mr. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Justice RM LodhaSupreme Court of IndiaThe Full Bench of the Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Here are some of the circumstances in which they have been used and applied: (a)  Specifications:  A specification list prepared by the owner was incorporated by reference into the contract ultimately entered into with the contractor, rather than attaching a specification list physically to the actual contract.2 (b)  Specific work and Best Practices:  A term in the main contract specifying the work to be carried out and stating the obligation to use “best trace… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:24 pm by Hull and Hull LLP
& D. 201, referred to in Hull, Probate Practice, 4th ed, p. 83. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Here is the application, in PDF and text: NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (ELLEN SMITH, APPLICANT) (Pursuant to Section 40 of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 25 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) APPLICANT (Respondent) RESPONDENT (Appellant) TAKE NOTICE that Ellen Smith hereby applies for leave to appeal to the Court, pursuant to sections 40 and 43 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am by K&L Gates
Atlas (see Item 6(C)(5) and Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan) Court Procedures of District Judge Lee H. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm by Mitchell Silverman
L.R. 7.1(a),(c)) mandate that memoranda of law in support and in opposition be filed for almost all motions. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm by Mitchell Silverman
L.R. 7.1(a),(c)) mandate that memoranda of law in support and in opposition be filed for almost all motions. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm by Mitchell Silverman
L.R. 7.1(a),(c)) mandate that memoranda of law in support and in opposition be filed for almost all motions. [read post]