Search for: "DANIEL A. VIRTUE"
Results 21 - 40
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
Pix Credit here Many times, the most unfortunate results can arise from the most worthy sentiments. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:14 pm
Written by Daniel Standing LL.B., Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 7:05 am
Armslist Wisconsin Supreme Court Fixes a Bad Section 230 Opinion—Daniel v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
VIP moved for summary judgment claiming that its dog toy was an “expressive work” which was protected under the First Amendment by virtue of the test set forth in Rogers v, Grimaldi,[2] which requires dismissal of an infringement claim unless the trademark owner can show that the challenged use “has no artistic relevance to the underlying work” or that it “explicitly misleads as to the source or the content of the work”[3] and that Jack… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
VIP moved for summary judgment claiming that its dog toy was an “expressive work” which was protected under the First Amendment by virtue of the test set forth in Rogers v, Grimaldi,[2] which requires dismissal of an infringement claim unless the trademark owner can show that the challenged use “has no artistic relevance to the underlying work” or that it “explicitly misleads as to the source or the content of the work”[3] and that Jack… [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
VIP moved for summary judgment claiming that its dog toy was an “expressive work” which was protected under the First Amendment by virtue of the test set forth in Rogers v, Grimaldi,[2] which requires dismissal of an infringement claim unless the trademark owner can show that the challenged use “has no artistic relevance to the underlying work” or that it “explicitly misleads as to the source or the content of the work”[3] and that Jack… [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Milligan or downing Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Trump for violating state law based on alleged "hush money" payments to Stormy Daniels. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am
Trump for violating state law based on alleged “hush money” payments to Stormy Daniels. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:02 am
The court ruled that the actions of the defendants were motivated by profit and “their conduct was intentional, malicious, and certain to cause harm by virtue of their infrastructure, ability to spread content, and massive audience. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Klein, the Supreme Court ruled that someone who had received a presidential pardon could not be deemed disloyal in virtue of his having participated on the Confederate side of the Civil War. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 8:28 am
Some number of low-information voters could have been influenced by greater prominence to the Stormy Daniels story on the eve of the election.Quite so. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:55 pm
Trump on state criminal charges relating to the cover-up of a possible extramarital affair with adult film performer Stormy Daniels. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:59 am
” While none of these countries were paragons of virtue, neither were they cooperating with each other or with Al Qaeda. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Jack Daniel's says no; VIP Products says yes. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
" The same procedure might be used collectively to resolve conflicts between the judgments of different individuals; Norman Daniels call this interpersonal use of reflective equilibrium, "wide reflective equilibrium. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:20 am
I respect and appreciate Daniel Pink. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
He distinguished Choate's "forensic" mind from Daniel Webster's "judicial" mind. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Hrdy, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at University of Akron School of Law, and Daniel H. [read post]
