Search for: "DOES 1-121" Results 21 - 40 of 1,222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 7:27 am by Dennis Crouch
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a split final written decision holding claims 1, 2, 5, 7, and 10–13 unpatentable based on the combinations of Keitler/Briggs (Ground 1) and Bridges/Briggs (Ground 3). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:30 pm by Fiene Kohn
EU legislative bodies are awarded a prerogative to assess and shape electoral law (paras. 121 f.). [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am by Tom Dannenbaum
In clarifying what it means to starve civilians as a method of warfare, it is critical to emphasize that the presence of combatants does not change the civilian character of a population that is predominantly composed of civilians (e.g. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§11–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:10 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
Tax & reporting obligations related to rental income You will report your rental income on Schedule 1 (Form 1040) and claim deductions on Schedule E (Form 1040). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
 Spoiler alert – here is the bottom line of the ruling at page 121: THIS COURT ORDERS that: 1. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
Does conduct of a particular description, in a specific set of circumstances, on its own unique facts, constitutes having "engaged in" "insurrection or rebellion" within the meaning of the Constitution? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The judgment helpfully walks through the existing case law, including in particular the Court of Appeal decision in Evans v Cig Mon Cymru [2008] 1 WLR 2675, on when an amendment falls to be considered under CPR 17.4 rather than CPR 17.1 ([46]-[52]). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
  Under that standard, the First Amendment does not preclude punishment for incitement if it is established that the speech in question was “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action” and was “likely to incite or produce such action. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm by admin
Socrates viewed philosophy as beginning in wonder,[1] but Socrates and his philosophic heirs recognized that philosophy does not get down to business until it starts to clarify the terms of discussion. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:51 pm by thomasgalvani
  It does not raise prior art, and it does not identify grammatical issues or drawing errors or clarity problems. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm by Dennis Crouch
[T]hat tool does not necessarily work properly for patents to which the URAA applies, because there are now instances, like here, in which a patent that issues first does not expire first. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:44 am by Dennis Crouch
But however it is interpreted, the sentence presents several concerns: 1) First, the sentence seems to assume that training a machine learning model on copyrighted works made freely available on the open Internet is likely to be deemed (or should be deemed) a copyright violation. [read post]