Search for: "Does 1-141"
Results 21 - 40
of 991
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
What does it mean for an organization to be operated for the promotion of social welfare? [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:03 pm
Four were female, and three were aged 1 to 2. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
New Section 261(a)(1) is being added in light of Crispo v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
Arthrex, Inc. , 141 S. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Under Section 141(c)(2), a committee does not have any power with respect to approving an agreement of merger or its terms. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Moelis & Company, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held that a “new wave” stockholder agreement between Moelis & Company (the “Company”) and its founder, CEO, and board chairman, Ken Moelis was invalid under Section 141(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) because it contained “pre-approval rights” over a number of corporate actions, required the board to recommend individuals designated by Moelis for a… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Moelis & Company, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held that a “new wave” stockholder agreement between Moelis & Company (the “Company”) and its founder, CEO, and board chairman, Ken Moelis was invalid under Section 141(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) because it contained “pre-approval rights” over a number of corporate actions, required the board to recommend individuals designated by Moelis for a… [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
(Doc. 1). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
App. 5th 141, 148-49 (2020) (suicide); Roe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
Still to come (maybe) 1. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Ct., U.S., 141 S. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Does conduct of a particular description, in a specific set of circumstances, on its own unique facts, constitutes having "engaged in" "insurrection or rebellion" within the meaning of the Constitution? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Under that standard, the First Amendment does not preclude punishment for incitement if it is established that the speech in question was “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action” and was “likely to incite or produce such action. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
Garland , 141 S. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Moab Partners LP,[1] a closely followed case that ought to address whether a purported failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1] (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
It was therefore within the scope of honest comment for the Defendant to say that, given the Claimant’s status as a leading inventor and entrepreneur, his hypocritical and highly symbolic actions could undermine the confidence of others in the UK and harm the country thereby, and hypocrisy of this sort does not set one up as other than a poor moral example to young people [141-144]. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
In other words, the Department of Commerce does not have the sort of rulemaking power that the EPA was given in the Clean Air Act and that was expressly exercised in writing the regulations sustained in Chevron. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm
Wilkinson, 141 S. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Section 241 does not fit that description. [read post]
