Search for: "Donn Zaretsky" Results 21 - 40 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 1:42 pm by Brian Frye
Over at The Art Law Blog, Donn Zaretsky discusses the same case, in relation to several other related cases, specifically Pape v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:20 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
A catch-up lunch with my good friend, Donn Zaretsky, yesterday afternoon reminded me to play a little catch-up on the art law front. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 2:15 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Donn Zaretsky agrees with his co-teacher, Amy Adler, that the current fair use doctrine doesn’t favor the rich over poor. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
From Robert Clarida, by way of Donn Zaretsky at the Art Law Blog. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 2:54 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Donn Zaretsky, long time champion of deaccessioning, says never-say-never: “It never made any sense to say there were no possible circumstances in which selling art to generate operating funds could be justified. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 11:40 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
As Donn Zaretsky rightly points out, Schwendener is entitled to her aesthetic opinion, but she’s way off on the facts. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:02 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Donn Zaretsky goes through the judges opinion on the 5Pointz ‘graffiti mecca’ conflict. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:12 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Donn Zaretsky wonders what the hoopla is given that art will, at some point down the line, benefit the public. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
Donn Zaretsky, unsurpisingly, took exception to the post I wrote yesterday, in which I strongly condemned his assertion that “you can make the traditional four-factor fair use analysis do whatever you want it to do. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 10:49 am
Thinking more about Mark Stryker's excellent tweet yesterday --  where he basically says in one sentence what I've been trying to say here for about 12 years -- and Everson board president Jessica Arb Danial's excellent piece, I'm reminded of the initial question I had about this whole issue, as quoted in Jori Finkel's New York Times piece all those years ago:"Donn Zaretsky, a New York lawyer who specializes in art cases, has sympathized with… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:50 pm
Judd Tully has a piece in the February Art+Auction on the Christie's decision I wrote about back in November here.I'm quoted in the piece as follows:"The logic of this decision, says Donn Zaretsky of the New York law firm John Silberman Associates, means that 'any subsequent buyer â€â [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 3:19 am
The author of the Art Law Blog, Donn Zaretsky, said in an e-mail that he would be concerned about what he called the adverse selection problem â€â [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:59 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Donn Zaretsky makes great points against it, and some for it, based on “fairness. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:30 pm by George M. Wallace
Los Angeles Times art critic Christopher Knight has a bone to pick with New York arts lawyer (and proprietor of The Art Law Blog) Donn Zaretsky. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:13 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
I chose these five individuals, Lian Amaris, Joanna Montoya Robotham, Donn Zaretsky, Antonio Sergio Bessa, and Molleen Theodore based on previous conversations with them but also primarily because I believed they would bring diverse answers to the prompt question. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:42 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Donn Zaretsky’s column looks at whether the state of Texas can make otherwise harmless photographs illegal if the photographer had the wrong intent when he took them. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:13 pm
Why can there never be any other 'use of proceeds,' wonders New York lawyer Donn Zaretsky, 'no matter how important to an institution's mission? [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 7:43 am
":"Donn Zaretsky, a New York lawyer who specializes in art cases, has sympathized with the National Academy at [The Art Law Blog], asking why a museum can sell art to buy more art but not to cover overhead costs or a much-needed education center. 'Why should we automatically assume that buying art always justifies a deaccessioning, but that no other use of proceeds â€â [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
I'm quoted as follows:"Donn Zaretsky, a lawyer in New York who specializes in art law, is often approached by artists who perceive echoes of their own work in advertisements. 'It does seem like advertising people are pushing the envelope on this,' he said. 'They're being more and more brazen in their borrowing. [read post]