Search for: "Flores v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2019, 8:44 am by Peter Margulies
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued the first of three installments of draft guidance intended to protect against “potential attacks” on the United States’ food supply. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm by Victoria Clark
District Court for the Central District of California to modify the Settlement Agreement in Flores v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Matthew Kolken
District Court for the Central District of California to modify the Settlement Agreement in Flores v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It’s disturbing, to say the least.Perhaps the United States will never be Gilead. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Again, these are statutory constructions, not constitutional guarantees.As I have documented in God vs. the Gavel: The Perils of Extreme Religious Liberty, there are thousands of statutory exemptions, or “rights,” in the United States that harm others. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 12:26 pm by Steven Cohen
United States of AmericaUnited States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit – November 23rd, 2016) is an appeal from district court orders excluding testimony from an proposed expert witness and a final judgment in favor of the government. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
In The Intercept, Lee Fang takes issue with Justice Anthony Kennedy’s recent refusal to respond to Fang’s request for a comment on Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]