Search for: "GAINES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 21 - 40
of 517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2023, 6:02 am
” Dumpson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:13 pm
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia highlights the importance of pleading specific facts in support of unfair business practices claims to survive a Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
… (the "District of Columbia Case"). [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Decisions this Week United KingdomGilham v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
In Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia, officers, directors and employees ("Employee") owe the company an undivided duty of loyalty. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:34 pm
GermanyDer Dritte Weg v. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:44 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit did just that in the recent case of Murphy v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:31 am
Two years ago, when the Supreme Court decided in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:04 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, as prescribed in the Detainee Treatment Act and Military Commissions Act. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:08 pm
District Court disagreed. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:41 am
By Eric Goldman Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm
Further proof that the death of Crawford has been greatly exaggerated comes in the form of a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
31 May 2013, 5:37 am
Fourteen states and the District of Columbia provided records that identified an applicant's race. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 3:38 pm
District of Columbia, 07-335; the city brief filed on Friday was in opposition to that filing. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:25 pm
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
