Search for: "J. DOE # 2"
Results 21 - 40
of 12,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2012, 8:03 am
John Does 1-11 Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-00294-PPS-APR File Date: Monday, July 30, 2012 Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLC Plaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:15 pm
John Does 1-16 Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-00370-JVB-APR File Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Plaintiff: Patrick Collins, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:11 am
Private ...IPKat readers might remember [here] that a few weeks ago Green J issued a judgment concerning the recently introduced exception for personal copies for private use (s28B of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 ('CDPA')), notably the fact that such provision does not currently envisage a fair compensation requirement.BASCA, the Musicians' Union, and UK Music filed an application for judicial review against UK… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
At least three of the above-mentioned decisions (see point [7]) finding that R 25(1) EPC 1973 (R 36(1)) does not set a time limit but a condition, namely J 10/01, J 24/03 and J 18/04, were issued well before the notification of the examination report dated 19 July 2006. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:50 am
From the Legal Talk Network: On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, J. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
German is an official language of the EPO, so the exception of Rule 36(2) does not appear to apply. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:56 am
Matter of J-G-P- does not purport to reassess longstanding BIA and Ninth Circuit precedent concerning simple assault offenses, and because it misapplied that precedent, its conclusion is unreasonable. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:44 am
The J-1 exemption does not apply to a J-2 visa holder, meaning that generally, J-2 visa holders are subject to FICA taxes (Social security taxes & Medicare taxes), federal income taxes and, where applicable, state and local income taxes. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
J 11/87 [3.3, 3.6]; J 27/94 [8)) and is not allowed to reverse these acts so that they can be considered as never filed (J 10/87 [12]; J 4/97 [2]).On the other hand, the Boards of Appeal considered that R 88 acknowledges as a further legal value the desirability of having regard to true as opposed to ostensible party intentions in legal proceedings (T 824/00 [6]) in appropriate circumstances. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:15 am
Judge Guzman sua sponte severed Does 2-88 pursuant to Fed. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:18 am
June 24, 2013) (Guzman, J.). [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
This deduction economically offsets the prior income inclusion under subsection 15(2), but does not eliminate or override the original inclusion for tax purposes. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am
In this respect, the appellant invoked the principle of good faith or protection of legitimate expectations and cited the allegedly pertinent decision J 14/94. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:45 am
Oct. 23, 2015) (Coleman, J.). [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al.CALKINS, J.[ ¶1] John Doe appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting Evert Fowle, Craig Poulin, and Everett Flannery's motions to dismiss, and dismissing Doe's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:56 am
Aspects that should be considered are, in particular, how long the proceedings before the national courts or authorities have been pending, the duration of the suspension and whether the request for suspension of the grant proceedings was filed at a late stage (J 6/10, point 4.2 of the reasons; J 7/10, point 4.1 of the reasons; J 15/13, point 2.5 of the reasons; J 33/03, point 2.2 of the reasons).These criteria have not to be fulfilled cumulatively, and they may… [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 1:00 am
The appeal complies with the requirements of Articles 106 to 108 and Rule 99 EPC and is therefore admissible.2. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:28 am
Moreover, the Ukrainian Embassy does not intend to issue a No Objection statement for our client’s possible J-1 visa waiver. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status CLIENT: Albanian LOCATION: Chicago / Washington DC ISSUES: J-1 2-Year Foreign Residency Requirement Our client came to the United States in February 2001 with a J-1 visa. [read post]
