Search for: "Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Jack Goldsmith also responded to Deeks and Lederman with a similar legal justification if the White House decided to go after Damascus without Congressional or U.N. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am by Caitlin Gilligan, Rishabh Bhandari
In response to yesterday’s suicide bombing on Jordan’s border with Syria, Amman has declared its borders with Syria and Iraq to be closed military zones. [read post]
13 May 2016, 11:12 am by Rebecca Ingber
Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman have put forward competing views over whether this lawsuit is a big deal. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm by Douglas Cantwell
A host of commentators (respectively, Ashley Deeks, Jack Goldsmith, Daniel Bethlehem, Goldsmith again, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin and Marty Lederman) have weighed-in on why Egan’s definition of “imminence” may seem familiar. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 9:53 am by Rita Siemion, Heather Brandon
Marty Lederman provided a broad summary over at Just Security and here at Lawfare Jack Goldsmith, Ashley Deeks, and Daniel Bethlehem have been discussing Egan’s treatment of imminence under the jus ad bellum. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:36 am by Benjamin Wittes
Ashley Deeks, Marty Lederman, Jack Goldsmith and Daniel Bethlehem have already commented on State Department Brian Egan's speech at ASIL last week. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 8:25 am by John Bellinger
  Both Jack and Marty Lederman have addressed the exclusion of OLC, but I was equally if not more concerned by the exclusion of the Legal Adviser for an operation in Pakistan that raised numerous international law issues. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:50 am
As Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman have argued, the deal could be legally valid without congressional approval if it is a nonbinding executive agreement. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
  At Just Security, Marty Lederman adds to his analysis of the decision with parts five, six, and seven of his series; Marty also discusses the case in a podcast with Jack Goldsmith at Lawfare. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Cody Poplin
On this week’s Lawfare Podcast, Lawfare Founding Editor Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman—Georgetown law professor, Just Security blogger, and former Justice Department official—sat down to discuss the Supreme Court’s sweeping ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Cody Poplin
On this week’s Lawfare Podcast, Lawfare Founding Editor Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman—Georgetown law professor, Just Security blogger, and former Justice Department official—sat down to discuss the Supreme Court’s sweeping ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Sebastian Brady
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman argued that there really isn’t a serious question as to the President’s authority to reach a nuclear agreement with Iran, given that the agreement is probably going to be non-binding under international law. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:33 pm
Jack Goldsmith (Harvard) and Marty Lederman (Georgetown) in a very interesting post at Just Security. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:00 pm
(To his credit, Marty Lederman may have been the first to identify the significance of the focus on the Armed Forces, but that was not until many years later in January 2005.) [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
Prepared Testimony of Robert Chesney Charles I. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
As Jack Goldsmith has rightly argued: [T]he Obama draft AUMF does not restrain the President. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the case comes from Akiva Shapiro in The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Garrett Epps for The Atlantic, Eugene Kontorovich of The Volokh Conspiracy (parts one and two), Marty Lederman at Just Security, Jack Goldsmith at Lawfare, Michael Ramsey at The Originalism Blog, Gershom Gorenberg in The American Prospect, and Peter Spiro at Opinio Juris. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:31 am by Amy Howe
”  At Just Security, Marty Lederman reacts to both posts, concluding that the federal government and Goldsmith “probably have the better of the argument here. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:57 am
Marty Lederman joins into my discussion with Jack Goldsmith about the Art. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:48 pm
And today at "Just Security," Marty Lederman has a post titled "The Article I argument in Zivotofsky. [read post]