Search for: "James v. High Tech Construction"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
., the cloud);[28] the Snowden disclosures and resulting suspicion of U.S. surveillance practices in Europe;[29] the U.S. government’s reaction to those disclosures;[30] the increased use of encryption;[31] the rise of ISIL and recent attacks including those involving Charlie Hebdo and the French high-speed train;[32] increased surveillance authorized by new foreign laws;[33] and perhaps other aggressive counter-terrorism activities by European governments that may be at least… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
In Colorado, the Tenth Circuit was a cosponsor of Forty Years Since Keyes Equality of Education Opportunity and the Legal Construction of Modern Metropolitan America. much as the DC Circuit's on Bolling v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
You’re high profile. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
What’s the relevance of the economist v. legal scholars? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
These shifts are significant in that they pull the software liability discussion in two directions, compelling us to start holding vendors at least partially accountable for poor software development practices but also complicating any attempt to construct a coherent liability regime. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 3:46 am
Int’l Game Tech. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
The meeting will focus on cutting-edge issues in the high tech space with overlapping content in related industries, including clean tech, nanotech, and medical devices. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
James G. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:33 am
Michael Lin and James Cleeve, both of Marks & Clerk, are presenting. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
” Vivid Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Clariti Eyewear, Inc. (271 Patent Blog) (Inventive Step) CAFC reverses BPAI's claim interpretation: In re Vaidyanathan (Gray on Claims) CAFC affirms claim construction and rejects indefiniteness argument: Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(EFF) United States US General US Chamber of Commerce cites #19 rank, wants tougher IP laws (Ars Technica) USPTO Director David Kappos blogs (Securing Innovation) Kappos sets goals for new PTO administration (Inventive Step) (Patents4Life) US Patent Reform Tech companies send letter on patent reform to Secretary Locke (Patent Docs) US Patents Summary of local patent rules affecting claim construction practice (Part 3 of 5) (Gray on Claims) Did you… [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Reading, MA; Sandra Scholten, President) A-Tech Security Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(IP finance) An IP strategist’s economic forecast for 2010: an outsider’s view and how one can outperform the ‘experts’ (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Australia Advisory Council on Intellectual Property proposes setting up IP dispute resolution centre to deal with patent disputes (Managing Intellectual Property) Brazil IP infringement and capacity to sue in Brazil (IP tango) WTO rules in favour of Brazil, allows for cross retaliation against… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Plymouth, MA; James Baker, President) 21 Street, Inc. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Afro-IP) Indigenous community goes digital with high-tech support from WIPO (WIPO) Korea Koreans plan NPE to reduce the country’s huge patent licensing deficit (IAM) (IAM) Libya Libya, Canada sign nuclear pact – but what of the IP? [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated DVD (Spicy… [read post]
