Search for: "John Dehn" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 8:17 am by John Dehn
by John Dehn Last week I posted about the challenges to and importance of judicial review of war measures against U.S. citizens. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:36 am by John Dehn
by John Dehn Let me respond to Kevin’s thoughtful post and discuss an opportunity for judicial review of an (implicit or explicit) elected branch assertion of the existence of an armed conflict. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by John Dehn
by John Dehn In response to my last post, Raha Wala asked a wonderfully difficult question. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:48 pm by Chris Borgen
by Chris Borgen As well as John Dehn, whom Peggy has previously welcomed, we would like to welcome Michael Scharf to guest blogging with us for the next couple of weeks. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:01 am by John Dehn
by John Dehn I’d like to call attention to comments by Ben Wittes over at Lawfare regarding two recent New York Times editorials. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:51 pm by John Dehn
by John Dehn First and foremost, I express my sincere appreciation to all of the Opinio Juris contributors (as well as special thanks to Peggy for the generous introduction). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:59 am by Peggy McGuinness
by Peggy McGuinness Opinio Juris is pleased to welcome for an extended guest-blogging stint our friend and frequent contributor, John Dehn. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:58 am by Robert Chesney
  I received many very interesting responses, and would direct attention in particular to what Ken Anderson has to say on the topic here (as well as John Dehn’s comment to Ken’s post). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:18 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Second, and certainly timely, the Cato Institute has a set of essays up by John Dehn and others looking at the legality of targeted killing. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:16 am by Deborah Pearlstein
The current debate is whether Congress should authorize the President to use force (including force to detain) against more than just these categories of individuals and groups, and whether or not connected to 9/11 per se.Ok, that said, Bobby suggests there are two categories of individual the United States may need/want to detain in the coming years who he thinks may not be covered by the existing AUMF: (1) Al Qaeda-member detainees like KSM who we’re currently holding at Gitmo and who we may… [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:20 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Ok, that said, Bobby suggests there are two categories of individual the United States may need/want to detain in the coming years who he thinks may not be covered by the existing AUMF: (1) Al Qaeda-member detainees like KSM who we’re currently holding at Gitmo and who we may want to continue to hold after the cessation of active hostilities in Afghanistan (when IHL would presumably require Taliban members to be repatriated); and (2) a bomb-making expert (or the like) who’s a member of… [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:28 pm by Marty Lederman
[UPDATE: John Bellinger's 2006 speech when he was State Legal Adviser similarly stated that "I am not suggesting that because remain in a state of armed conflict with al Qaida, the United States is free to use military force against al Qaida in any state where an al Qaida terrorist may seek shelter. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm by Chris Borgen
John's School of Law Kristen Boon, Seton Hall University School of Law John Dehn, United States Military Academy Jennifer Trahan, New York University Jeffrey Walker, Georgetown University 4 p.m.-5:30pm Roundtable Discussion: "Is America Exceptional in the International Order? [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:13 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
by Kevin Jon Heller Just a quick update to point out that Pennumbra, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review's online companion, has published the fourth and final installment of my debate with John Dehn on the targeted killing of Al-Aulaqi. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:48 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
John's closing statement will be up next Monday, and my closing statement - which does reply to John's arguments - will be available the week after that. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:28 am by John Steele
At the Columbia Law Review Sidebar, John Dehn (USMA) offers an interesting critique of Trevor Morrison's proposal that OLC lawyers treat prior memoranda as precedent. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:47 am by Robert Chesney
Ben’s most recent post on the al-Aulaki suit has precipitated an interesting discussion at Opinio Juris involving, among others, John Dehn,  Kevin Heller, and Mary Ellen O’Connell (Mary Ellen’s thoughts appear in Kevin’s post and in his comment thread). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:24 pm by John Dehn
by John Dehn [John Dehn is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Law at the United States Military Academy. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:32 am by Kevin Jon Heller
  For a very interesting discussion of “murder in violation of the law of war” as municipal, common law offense, see my friend John Dehn’s article in the Journal of International Criminal Justice here. [read post]