Search for: "John Doe Nos. 1-19" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That fall, defendants wrote four letters to DEC regarding tidal wetlands permit nos. 1- 4 728-03511, 1-4 728-05497, 1-4 728-05498 and 1-4 728-05499, which allowed Village People to construct four single-family residences on its properties (id., ,i 10; NYSCEF Doc No. 40 at 103, 107, 112 and 135). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  On July 15, 2011, ALJ Charneski determined that HTC violated Section 337 through its infringement of claims 1, 8, 15, and 19 of U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
The petitions and conditional cross-petition for a writ of certiorari in Nos. 10-929, 10-931, and 10-932 concern the boundaries of that reservation. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Like the children’s book, the “Very Hungry Caterpillar,” [18] unfettered access to capital through Rule 506 has had a bloating effect on private issuers.[19] Whereas, in prior decades, small private issuers who grew and grew had to turn to the public markets to sate their capital needs, now Reg D, among other legal and regulatory mechanisms, has allowed for the development of pools of private capital sufficient to satisfy the needs of even the largest private issuers. [read post]
After 19 days of public hearings producing a 10,000-page record, the Commission concluded that NEPA did not require the SEC to mandate such disclosures, and the courts later agreed.[7] While the SEC in the 1971 release had limited disclosure to “material matters,” in 1975 the Commission mandated disclosure of all environmental proceedings to which a government was a party, whether or not the amounts at issue were material. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Bruno held that the agreements to pay kickbacks “are illegal and unenforceable” and “[t]hus, there is no legal theory that permits the plaintiffs to recover for damages for their alleged illegal contracts with John Does Nos. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Bartrip, “Irving John Selikoff and the Strange Case of the Missing Medical Degrees,” 58 J. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
First, the breadth of claim 19 is not as narrow as Microsoft argues and the district court concluded. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Obtaining money, valuable securities or other property by false pretenses, or by threats of injury. 19. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
”[19] Oreskes’ opinion could not be justified as expert experiential opinion because it was not based upon her personal experience; rather, her opinion was based upon her review of documents and reports of others. [read post]