Search for: "John Doe Personal Representative #3" Results 21 - 40 of 3,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Jim Sedor
How Corporate PAC Money Could End Up in the Personal Coffers of Sens. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Ioannidis “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” 1 PLoS Med 8 (2005). [3] Joseph P. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
”[3] Had Justice Kagan looked deeper into the Court’s case law as well as the letter and spirit of the Constitution, she would have reached a different conclusion. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jim Lindgren
" Perhaps the most notable expression of such ideas came from Chief Justice John Mar [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 2:29 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
But the second part of the DOJ’s gloss on their allegation does make one wonder. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
As law professor John Reynolds explains, “With the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa the special committee was dissolved by the UN. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
John Rogers pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and conspiracy to obstruct justice. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
 Pix Credit here On 7 March 2024, President Biden delivered the 2024 State of the Union Address. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am by Eric Segall
In any event, the Court does recognize that there is a case where a state (a Southern one) did actually disqualify someone under Section 3:In 1868, the Governor of Georgia refused to commission John Christy, who had won the most votes in a congressional election, because—in the Governor’s view—Section 3 made Christy ineligible to serve. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The court held that Section 3 did notapply because the Presidency, which Section 3 does notmention by name, is not an “office . . . under the United3Cite as: 601 U. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:42 pm by Anthony Zaller
On the federal level, in October 2023, a bill was introduced by Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) and John James (R-Mich.) to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to prohibit large employers from utilizing automated systems from automatically discarding applicants without a bachelor’s degree. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:21 pm by centerforartlaw
Disputes can arise when an agreement does not clearly outline terms related to payment and costs. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
That document omitted President George Washington from a list of "Persons Holding Civil Offices or Employments Under the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It does honor to the distinguished and long running series of which it is now an integral part. [read post]