Search for: "Jonathan Jackson"
Results 21 - 40
of 709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal The Quiet Way Democrats Hope to Expand Their Power at the State Level DNyuz – Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) | Published: 2/20/2024 Locked out of power on the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
Indeed, in The Oxford Handbook on Reputation Jonathan Karpoff lists “how and when do firms rebuild damaged reputations? [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
Indeed, in The Oxford Handbook on Reputation Jonathan Karpoff lists “how and when do firms rebuild damaged reputations? [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:09 pm
Again, time will tell.The post Did Justice Jackson Disclose the Outcome in Relentless and Loper-Bright? [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
In his opening statement on Thursday, Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell chose to mention only two of these arguments—Nos. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Ketanji Brown Jackson seemed enamored with the claim that Section 3 does not cover the Presidency, but other Justices focused on other issues. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor seemed skeptical about one argument made by Trump’s attorney, Jonathan Mitchell, that Chief Justice Samuel Chase’s circuit court decision in Griffin required Congress to pass enabling legislation to allow states to disqualify insurrectionists. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Indeed, the amazing thing about the oral argument was just how hilariously nonchalant Jackson was with regard the mass of historical materials by lawyers and non-lawyers she had been furnished; she even had Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell disclaiming “law office history” to avoid using history to serve his side so crudely. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Sarah Eichenberger and Jonathan Rotenberg are partners at the law firm of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
" The second installment focused on Justice Jackson's colloquies about "Office under the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin’s Case and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts; Why did Jonathan Mitchell not vigorously defend Griffin’s Case and Chief Justice Chase? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
[Why did Jonathan Mitchell not vigorously defend Griffin's Case and Chief Justice Chase? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Trump’s arguments Legal counsel for Trump, Jonathan Mitchell, began oral arguments with a short statement. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" She asked Jonathan Mitchell, "So are you arguing both in this case or just one? [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
(I will address that issue in a future post about Justice Jackson's colloquies). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:25 am
Jackson, US v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Three spouses of justices enter the guest box: Ashley Kavanaugh, Jesse Barrett, and Patrick Jackson. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
When Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell was questioned, none of the justices asked about whether Trump’s actions constituted an insurrection until Jackson raised it in her final question. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Jonathan Mitchell pushed back against that argument, fearful of what it would mean for the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
I would like to thank Sarah and Jonathan for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
