Search for: "Kimberly Clark Corp"
Results 21 - 40
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2018, 9:51 am
Kimberly–Clark Corp., 889 F.3d 956 (9thCir. 2018) (amended)Previous discussion. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:34 am
Kimberly–Clark Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 1:33 pm
” Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 11:31 am
Guest Post by Professor Samuel F. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:46 am
The Board sustained Kimberly-Clark's opposition to registration of the word + design mark shown below left, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with K-C's registered mark shown below right, both for bathroom tissue. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 11:05 am
Kimberly-Clark Corp., et al., No. 15-16173, 2017 WL 4700093 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:09 am
Ralph Haeusler, Opposition No. 91220565 [Opposition to registration of the mark CROSSBOX for various clothing items in class 25, bread and pastries in class 30, and conducting sports competitions in class 41, on the grounds of lack of bona fide intent and likelihood of confusion with the allegedly famous mark CROSSFIT, registered for clothing, informational services in the field of nutrition, and entertainment in the nature of sports competitions].December 13, 2017 - 2 PM:… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:59 am
Kimberly-Clark Corp., 2017 WL 4700093, -- F.3d --, No. 15-16173 (9th Cir. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 3:15 am
September 6, 2017 - 2 PM: Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
Kimberly-Clark Corp., No. 14-CV-1142 et al., 2017 WL 1155398, --- F.Supp.3d ---- (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1986); Kimberly-Clarke Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 5:36 pm
See Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 1:05 pm
Kimberly-Clark Seeks to Perforate Its Case From Consolidation On July 15, 2016, Kimberly-Clark Corporation (“Kimberly-Clark”) filed a letter with Judge Jack Weinstein of the Eastern District of New York to notify the court that the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) closed its investigation into Kimberly-Clark’s flushable wipes advertising, requesting that Kimberly-Clark’s… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Oracale Corp., No. 15-1014 (Same questions as Cuozzo and Achates v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:16 am
The advertisements, which were challenged by competitor Kimberly-Clark Corporation, claimed that Charmin Ultra Mega Rolls “last longer and provide “more ‘gos’ per roll,” which NAD determined were not sufficiently substantiated. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Oracle Corp., (Same questions as Cuozzo and now-dismissed Achates v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Oracale Corp., No. 15-1014 (Same questions as Cuozzo and now-dismissed Achates v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Oracale Corp., No. 15-1014 (Same questions as Cuozzo and now-dismissed Achates v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Oracale Corp., No. 15-1014 (Same questions as Cuozzo and now-dismissed Achates v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Oracale Corp., No. 15-1014 (Same questions as Cuozzo and now-dismissed Achates v. [read post]
