Search for: "Kumho Tire Co. Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
Kumho Tire Co., 2009 WL 2229902, at *4 (D. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:16 am
Although Daubert addressed scientific evidence, the Supreme Court in Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm
Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:30 am
See Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
PLAC has been in every major Supreme Court Daubertcase – Kumho Tire, Joiner, Weisman and in state supreme court cases around the country where similar issues arise under state law. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
Id. at *2 (quoting Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
” Later, in Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
” Later, in Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:09 am
’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:26 am
Precision Printing and Packaging, Inc., 188 F.3d 606, 618 (5th Cir.1999), quoting Kumho Tire, 119 S.Ct. at 1176. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am
Springstead then pointed out that the legal standard courts apply to the admissibility of expert testimony comes from the Supreme Court’s decisions in Kumho Tire Co. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:35 pm
Inc., 2012 U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Daubert v.Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 589–90 (1993);Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 5:07 am
” Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:24 pm
” Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:05 am
In patent cases, the district court has "a special obligation to 'ensure that any and all scientific testimony. . .is not only relevant, but reliable.'" Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm
, Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:35 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Kumho Tire Co., v. [read post]
