Search for: "LANDMARK 4, LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
”[4] Prior to the enactment of VARA, cases such as Richard Serra v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 10:55 am
4: 22-CCB-0112 – Paramount Pictures Corporation v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm
"); Conseco Servs., LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:04 am
Trinitas Cellars LLC, Case No. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:25 am
” 4. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
In the landmark case of Huizhou Weitong Real Estate Co., Ltd v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
” Recognizing that the Sherman Act could be read to bar all contracts, federal courts for over a century have interpreted the 1890 antitrust law only to apply to “unreasonable” restraints of trade.[7] The Supreme Court first adopted this concept in its landmark 1911 decision in Standard Oil, upholding the lower court’s dissolution of John D. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Republicans Censure Cheney, Kinzinger, Call Jan. 6 Probe Attack on ‘Legitimate Political Discourse’ Reuters – Doins Chiach | Published: 2/4/2022 The Republican Party censured U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
In a brief filed in a redistricting case, lawyers for the Texas argued it is not clear that Section 2 of the act allows private challenges to state laws at all, an argument that flies in the face of how the landmark civil rights-era statute has been interpreted by federal courts for decades. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm
Whilst the claim concerns issues which will affect many, describing the decision as a ‘landmark ruling’ is an exaggeration. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:53 am
The Court does not find that it is impossible; only that Epic Games failed in its burden to demonstrate Apple is an illegal monopolist.[1] Epic’s principal theory was that Apple was the monopolist in each of two “aftermarkets” consisting of: (1) the distribution of iOS apps; and (2) payment processing for in-app purchases in iOS apps.[2] Such antitrust claims, which assert a manufacturer’s monopoly over aftermarket services provided for the manufacturer’s… [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
Google LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 5:58 am
(Google LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 7:03 am
T&T Subsea, LLC, the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 6:33 pm
In its landmark 2011 decision in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm
Soriano v Forensic News LLC, heard 14 and 15 December 2020 (Jay J). [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 8:06 am
Live UpdatesNJ Governor Patrick Murphy Signs Landmark COVID Compensation Law 9/14/20….Jon L. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:18 am
Oral argument in the matter of Eaglemed, LLC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:55 am
McCabe today announced the filing of two lawsuits to compel the clean-up of contamination and recover Natural Resource Damages (NRDs).The first suit is against Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC and Arkema Inc., two companies responsible for widespread contamination from toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) emanating from a Gloucester County facility, which has contaminated public drinking water in the region. [read post]
