Search for: "LAURENCE H. SILBERMAN"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2019, 7:18 am
One of these opinions, a 1974 effort by Laurence Silberman, applied an early formulation of the clear statement rule to construe criminal laws (concerning conflicts of interest) not to apply to the president. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:31 am
Memorandum for Laurence H. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
.-- Judge Laurence Silberman, likewise a senior Judge on the DC Circuit. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 5:20 pm
"When Politics Becomes Existential": Today at the "Election Law Blog," Richard Pildes has a post that begins, "Judge Laurence H. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 10:50 am
Circuit Judge Laurence H. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 6:50 am
Tatel and Laurence H. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:02 am
Laurence H. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Michael Reisman & Mahnoush H. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm
Senior Judge Laurence H. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 5:57 am
Pillard and Senior Circuit Judge Laurence H. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
Stetson, HoganLovells LLPSitting as judge, Laurence H. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
Tatel and Senior Circuit Judge Laurence H. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:33 am
Senior Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman filed a separate statement. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:40 am
Circuit Judge Laurence H. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:15 am
via www.wsj.com Good old Judge Silberman. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:16 pm
Circuit Judge Laurence H. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 8:14 am
Circuit Judge Laurence H. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:50 pm
Silberman, The Development of “Final Offer Selection” FROM THE BAG Ross E. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:48 pm
Although the government has regularly won in the Circuit Court with an argument that only the lowest accepted standard of proof need be satisfied to justify continued detention, a senior judge on the Circuit Court, Laurence H. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:34 am
The unpublished per curiam judgment, by Judges Brett Kavanaugh, Laurence Silberman, and Douglas Ginsburg, reads as follows: The petitioner argues hearsay evidence, upon which the district court relied in determining he is lawfully detained as part of Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or an associated enemy force, is inadmissible in a habeas corpus proceeding. [read post]
