Search for: "Law v. SSA"
Results 21 - 40
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 9:15 am
Saul, which dealt with a constitutional Appointments Clause challenge to Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) under the Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:18 pm
In Carr v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
Saul and Carr v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
Carr v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 11:18 am
Under Section 303(a)(1) of the SSA,a state’s laws must provide for “methods of administration” that are “reasonably calculated” to ensure full payment of unemployment benefits “when due” in order to receive a UI administrative grant. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 4:49 pm
” Rios, 2020 WL 7311343, at *3, citing Montour v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm
” In McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
When they turned to the case of confirmed directors, the justices had different views on whether the removal restrictions violate the Constitution — just as they did in the CFPB case earlier this year, Seila Law v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:14 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:15 pm
The petition in Davis asks the Supreme Court to determine whether claimants seeking disability benefits or supplemental security income under the Social Security Act (SSA) must exhaust their Appointments Clause challenges with the administrative law judge (ALJ) at the agency in order to obtain... [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:15 pm
The petition in Davis asks the Supreme Court to determine whether claimants seeking disability benefits or supplemental security income under the Social Security Act (SSA) must exhaust their Appointments Clause challenges with the administrative law judge (ALJ) at the agency in order to obtain judicial review of that challenge in federal court. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 11:14 am
These similarities are evidenced in the recent decision, Dimry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 11:36 am
The Antitrust Pleading Standard Is Shifting Back Toward the Plaintiff TWOMBLY AND THE PLAUSIBILITY STANDARD For those not familiar with antitrust law, Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
In Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:04 am
Under the controlling case law set forth in Golian v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
And recently, in a Supreme Court case called Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
Francisco acknowledged that the Supreme Court’s 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:49 am
T.C. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:53 am
Moreover, it awarded summary judgment in the employees’ favor on their claims for travel-time pay (Worley v. [read post]
