Search for: "MARK D. LINK" Results 21 - 40 of 4,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2016, 5:21 am by Mark Astarita
Call nationally recognized securities attorney Mark Astarita at 212-509-6544. 30 years of FINRA Regulatory and Enforcement experience. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:49 am
 The original raison d'etre for a trade mark was to help consumers by indicating the origin of goods and preventing consumers from being confused into purchasing the wrong product. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
(d) The Hearing Officer only considered the prejudice that the new evidence would cause to Titanic Spa but not the "very significant prejudice" to Titanic Liverpool. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
In light of such trends, even though the contested services in Classes 39 and 43 may not be considered to be strictly similar to the goods and services, they are still linked to the relevant commercial sector. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 5:24 pm
As to Applicant's goods in classes 16, 24, and 28, Opposers offered no proof of relatedness.As to the marks, the word MONSTER has a different meaning in Applicants' mark for video game cartridges and Opposers' marks. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
Since opposer had the burden of proof with respect to its claim of priority and likelihood of confusion, its Section 2(d) claim failed.Fraud: Opposer's fraud claim hinged on the contention that applicant's CEO had actual knowledge of opposer's prior use of the AGENT LINK mark. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Darren
The Principles- Likelihood of ConfusionAs summarised by the UKIPO, are as follows: (a) the likelihood of confusion must be appreciated globally, taking account of all relevant factors; (b) the matter must be judged through the eyes of the average consumer of the goods/ services in question; who is deemed to be reasonably well informed and reasonably circumspect and observant - but who rarely has the chance to make direct comparisons between marks and must instead rely upon the imperfect… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Operation Overlord, the code name for the D-Day invasion, marked a major turning point in the war, accelerating the collapse of Nazi Germany, which surrendered 11 months later. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Christine Corcos
Operation Overlord, the code name for the D-Day invasion, marked a major turning point in the war, accelerating the collapse of Nazi Germany, which surrendered 11 months later. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
  The Second Circuit provided, in Time Inc. v Petersen Publ’g Co., here, six factors which courts use to establish secondary meaning: (1) advertising expenditures, (2) consumer studies linking the mark to a source, (3) unsolicited media coverage of the product, (4) sales success, (5) attempts to plagiarize the mark and (6) length and exclusivity of the mark’s use. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 2:01 pm
  Poulton’s opposition is based on absolute grounds of refusal under section 3(1)(d) of the Trade Mark Act 1994, on the basis that it was a trade mark that consisted exclusively of “signs or indications which have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practices of the trade”. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:58 am by John L. Welch
This watch service highlights the marks of your firm's clients that were cited by the PTO against other marks, and includes links to the pertinent records.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:08 am
My first thought was trademark, and the C&D letter hints in this direction as well: indicating that the link might make it appear that the Police Department had “authorized” the link. [read post]
29 May 2007, 9:54 am
Last week I linked to this Richmond Times Dispatch report, which begins: "Mark D. [read post]