Search for: "MARK III INDUSTRIES, INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2013, 4:48 am
Hargis Industries, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 1810614 (8th Cir.) [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 4:54 am
The post Case Review – 1936230 Ontario Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:23 am
The Respondent’s narrative in SunSpots Productions Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
ATA III, 283 F.3d at 362 (internal quotation marks omitted)." [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:08 am
Practice Tip #3: doTERRA is currently embroiled in litigation in both state and federal court in Utah with Young Living, another giant in the essential-oil industry. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:45 am
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), in an acceptance, waiver, and consent action (AWC), sanctioned brokerage firm Cantella & Co., Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:25 am
” The “velcro” case is a good example, Velcro Industries B. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
Meanwhile, on the Class 46 trade mark law blog, former guest Kat Laetitia spots some non-confusingly similar diamond marks, here, and Katfriend Pedro Malaquias points to a recent Portuguese opposition involving "KART"-based marks. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:07 pm
(ii) if not, could CGS rely on the names of the second and third defendants; (iii) if the answer to the first or second question was "yes", was such use to be regarded as being "in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters"? [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 3:32 am
Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:55 am
Sundance Sauna, Inc., 427 F. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
III. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:01 pm
Attorney Russell represented Mark and Tammy LaRace in the recent Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling in U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm
The CAFC vacated an ITC decision: Kyocera Senco Industrial Tools Inc. and Koki Holdings America Ltd. each appeal from an International Trade Commission decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:05 am
These and many other cases are perceptively discussed in Ted's Introduction and in Section III of this article. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:16 am
(ii) if not, could CGS rely on the names of the second and third defendants; (iii) if the answer to the first or second question was "yes", was such use to be regarded as being "in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters"? [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
To be Frank, Nike’s lost out in LDNR LNDR Londoner mix-upFrank Industries PTY Ltd v Nike Retail BV [2018] EWHC 1893, High Court of England and Wales (July 2018)I covered the preliminary injunction won by Frank Industries in this case in Volume III. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
NVE, Inc., 2015 WL 871137, No. 08–11867 (E.D. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Hargis Industries, Inc. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
In its opposition, respondent Hargis Industries, Inc. argues that any alleged Circuit split is illusory. [read post]
