Search for: "MARY C. JACOBSON"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
“The ineligibility of same-sex couples for federal benefits is currently harming same-sex couples in New Jersey in a wide range of contexts,” Judge Mary C. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Lahav Mass Tort Litigation Blog Cornell M Michael C. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Jacobson, Mary C., P.J.Ch., C-42-10, MERCER COUNTY, June 8, 2011: The doctrine of res judicata “provides that a cause of action between parties that has been finally determined on the merits by a tribunal having jurisdiction cannot be relitigated by those parties or their privies in a new proceeding. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:31 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Jacobson, Mary C., P.J.Ch., C-42-10, MERCER COUNTY, June 8, 2011: The rule of collateral estoppel requires that “(1) the discrete issue to be precluded is identical to an issue in the prior proceeding; (2) the issue was ‘actually litigated’ in the prior proceeding; (3) the court in the prior proceeding issued a ‘final judgment on the merits;’ (4) the determination of the issue was ‘essential’ to… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:30 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Jacobson, Mary C., P.J.Ch., C-42-10, MERCER COUNTY, June 8, 2011: The New Jersey Supreme Court addressed issue preclusion in Watkins v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Jacobson, Mary C., P.J.Ch., C-42-10, MERCER COUNTY, June 8, 2011: R. 4:30A provides, “non-joinder of claims required to be joined by the entire controversy doctrine shall result in the preclusion of the omitted claims to the extent required by the entire controversy doctrine, except as provided by R. 4:64-5 (foreclosure actions) and R. 4:67-4(a) (leave required for counterclaims or cross-claims in summary actions). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Jacobson, Mary C., P.J.Ch., C-42-10, MERCER COUNTY, June 8, 2011: Rule 4:9-1 provides that leave to amend pleadings “shall be freely given in the interest of justice. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
Mary C. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 4:55 am
Testimony from MediaSentry and Jacobson should be barred under Daubert:(a) Under Fed. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 5:35 pm
Testimony from MediaSentry and Jacobson should be barred under Daubert:(a) Under Fed. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 3:04 am
Kim, which is about as frivolous as a motion can get, (b) the motion to preclude testimony about the RIAA's other cases, since at the first trial the RIAA itself introduced such evidence, (c) defendant's omission to have made an in limine motion excluding Dr. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 3:44 pm
Generating Greater State Tax Revenue: Tom Jacobson, Executive Director of Rural Dynamics, Inc., emphasizes there are potentially vast benefits possible with the L3C structure. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
Stringer.Hosted by Mary Max at the Max Studio37 W. 65th Street(Located between Columbus and Central Park West. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
Lindor has served her responsive papers.Her papers accuse the RIAA of persistent misrepresentations of fact throughout its papers, of violating the rules, and of misstating the law.She argued that the only reason the RIAA is seeking a "without prejudice" designation is to help give it a basis for arguing against its being assessed with attorneys fees.Declaration of Ray Beckerman in oppositionMemorandum of law in oppositionExhibit A-Jacobson testimonyExhibit B-Marie Lindor… [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 10:00 pm
Suzanne Jacobson * Hon. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 9:49 pm
Ginsburg, Mary L. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 6:59 pm
FosterExhibit C-Atlantic v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 2:24 am
Jacobson's multiple "reports", and to point out their many flaws, on behalf of Marie Lindor and all of the other victims of the RIAA extortion campaign, THANK YOU FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:21 am
Oregon Attorney General Reply Memorandum of Law*Oregon Attorney General Reply Affidavit*Exhibit F (Excerpt from Doug Jacobson deposition transcript in UMG v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 2:13 am
-Ray-->-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:p2pnet.netOther commentary & discussion on establishment of Expert Witness Defense Fund:p2pnet.netWiredSlashdotArs TechnicaThe InquirerHard OCPtweakers.net (Dutch)Linux.org.ru (Russian)ZDNet.Be (Dutch)Ratiatum (French)AfterdawnPunto Informatico (Italian)OS News (Polish)TechDirtTom's Hardware (Leonardo.it) (Italian)SlyckRepublika (Polish)p2pnet.net-->… [read post]
