Search for: "MCMAHAN"
Results 21 - 40
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2019, 8:36 am
McMahan observed thickening of the descending and transverse colon, “likely due to underdistention. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:49 am
This is timely; it appears in a new philosophy series at The New Statesman run by Aaron Wendland. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:18 am
Philosopher Jeff McMahan (Oxford) is among those involved with the project. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 7:10 am
Here were some of the most popular posts from the second quarter of the year: Singer and McMahan on the Stubblefield case (April) Disability Studies appears to be an advocacy field, not a scholarly one: the case of Anna Stubblefield... [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:55 am
...at Quartz. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:06 pm
Gross, The Deaths of Combatants Jeff McMahan, Proportionate Defense Jovana Davidovic, Justification and Proportionality in War Saba Bazargan-Forward, Compensation and Proportionality in War Adil Haque, A Theory of Jus in Bello Proportionality Ariel Colonomos, Proportionality in Warfare as a Political Norm Claire Finkelstein, The Equality of Lives in War and the Principle of Distinction Jon Todd, Guiding Executive Decisions on Combatancy in War Andrew Forcehimes, Weighing Unjust… [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:07 am
Jeff McMahan (Oxford) called to my attention this piece he and Peter Singer (Princeton) wrote about the "injustice" involved in the conviction of Anna Stubblefield for rape of a severely disabled man whom she believed had consented to sex via... [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
City of Spartanburg South Carolina Court Holds that Estate’s Entitlement to Worker’s Permanent Total Disability Benefits Was Not Dependent on Finding of Maximum Medical Improvement – McMahan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
City of Spartanburg South Carolina Court Holds that Estate’s Entitlement to Worker’s Permanent Total Disability Benefits Was Not Dependent on Finding of Maximum Medical Improvement – McMahan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:10 pm
Related Blog Posts South Carolina Court Holds that Estate’s Entitlement to Worker’s Permanent Total Disability Benefits Was Not Dependent on Finding of Maximum Medical Improvement – McMahan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:10 pm
Related Blog Posts South Carolina Court Holds that Estate’s Entitlement to Worker’s Permanent Total Disability Benefits Was Not Dependent on Finding of Maximum Medical Improvement – McMahan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
Related Blog Posts: South Carolina Court Holds that Estate’s Entitlement to Worker’s Permanent Total Disability Benefits Was Not Dependent on Finding of Maximum Medical Improvement – McMahan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
Related Blog Posts: South Carolina Court Holds that Estate’s Entitlement to Worker’s Permanent Total Disability Benefits Was Not Dependent on Finding of Maximum Medical Improvement – McMahan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 11:26 am
This one is quite good on his philosophical work (probably due to the fact that the author consulted with Jeff McMahan). [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:56 am
It appears some readers missed this item added as an update to the Parfit post earlier this week, so I post it again here: Jeff McMahan (Oxford) writes: "I believe that the last public talk he gave was to the... [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
” McMahan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:58 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of McMahan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:58 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of McMahan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 12:59 am
It is argued that the current philosophical critique of IHL by Jeff McMahan focused on individual moral liability to attack is an intellectual dead-end and that the morally best rules are international laws that are the same for all fighters. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:18 am
Jeff McMahan (Oxford) kindly gave me permission to share his articulate and compelling defense of EA against its philosophical critics, which will appear in The Philosopher's Magazine: Download McMahan Philosophical Critiques of Effective Altruism 4-18-16 FINAL McMahan makes a number... [read post]
