Search for: "Mark B Rogers"
Results 21 - 40
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
" Rogers v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:52 am
But don't worry; it gets worse.]Now, on to Rogers. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:43 pm
Rogers simply requires that the junior user didn’t arbitrarily choose to use the mark just to exploit its publicity value. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
B) This case reminded me a lot of the Gucci v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
But just to make it easier for you, congratulations and thanks to (alphabetically): Michael Arkfeld, Ray Billotte, Judge Kyle Bryson, Andrew Federhar, Glenn Hamer, Bill Klain, Mark Larson, Lisa Loo, Judge Scott Rash (appointed in A.O. 2014-58), Judge John Rea, Trish Refo, Marcus Reinkensmeyer, Mark Rogers, Nicole Stanton, Steve Tully, Steven Weinberger and Judge Christopher Whitten (appointed in A.O. 2014-58). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:07 am
Roger & Sam S. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:24 am
Gary B. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 12:10 am
Clark, Treaty crimes Benjamin B. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
Ohio Feb. 23, 2011) and Rogers v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR BREVARD COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA ___________________________________ REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT __________________________________ MARK S. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:20 am
In addition to its registered mark, Comic Enterprises promotes its business in the UK using the words 'glee', 'the Glee Club' and through marketing emails referred to as 'Gleemails'.Since December 2009, Fox has produced the highly successful 'glee' TV show, a 'pop culture phenomenon', with accompanying DVD and album sales/downloads, and sales of glee TV merchandise in the UK.At first instance, Mr Roger Wyand QC sitting as a deputy… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
Nowlan made allegedly false statements about the ownership of the Buck Rogers mark, but never produced any products or granted any licenses. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:17 pm
Miller, Jr.Referred To: Magistrate Judge Roger B. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:23 am
Only the former must provide written reports (containing the information listed in FRCP 26(a)(2)(B)).In 2010, Rule 26(a)(2)(c) was added to emphasize that a Rule 26(2)(a)(2)(B) report is required only from an expert described in (a)(2)(B). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
In fact, Roger’s piece is so assured that I for one wouldn’t be surprised to find some of his arguments in the replying papers! [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
Just b/c it’s in the Lanham Act doesn’t make it foundational. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Title may seem surprising b/c Dogan advocated for TM use to distinguish b/t secondary and direct liability in TM law. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:22 am
[T]he introduction to the episode, where two rams head-butt one another as the introductory music crescendos;b. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:41 am
Evid. 611(b). [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
Steve reports: "Roger, brimming with energy, covered a total of 42 cases in an hour, split across the topics of jurisdiction, procedure, the internet, remedies, Brexit/single market, estoppel, criminal offences, the definition of trade mark, series marks, similarity of marks/signs, trade mark use, construction of contracts, consent and passing off, meaning that this was not a talk for those with a wandering mind. [read post]
