Search for: "Mark D Ware" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Canada’s Federal Court addressed this issue in H-D U.S.A., LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 11:11 am by Lori J. Paul, AACP
”It’s been known anecdotally,” says researcher Mark Ware, MD, assistant professor of anesthesia and family medicine at McGill University in Montreal. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:09 am
I'd say that Labatt has an uphill battle here.HK [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 1:51 pm by Mitch Kowalski
Get the best marks and you’ll get the best job. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
The District Court of Tel Aviv ruled that the trademark HABITAT, registered in Israel in multiple classes more than 40 years ago by a local furniture and house ware retailer, should be cancelled on the ground that it was registered in bad faith, since it was done with the knowledge that HABITAT was an "international mark" that enjoyed "international goodwill. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 1:09 pm by Aaron Walter
” He’d also like to be recognized as having served the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 1:03 pm
This article says the Virginia Trial Lawyers Association is one of the largest donors to candidates for the General Assembly in the upcoming elections.According to VPAP, here is how the VTLARepublican: $147,000 (49%)Democrat: $149,250 (50%)Other: $2,500 144 donations totaling $298,750Candidate/Committee ContributionsAlbo, David B (R-H042), $5,000 Alexander, Kenneth C (D-H089), $500 Amundson, Kristen (D-H044), $500 Armstrong, Ward L (D-H010), $6,000 … [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 2:49 am
The court found that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board was correct in finding the mark to be generic. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
No person shall (a) make a false or misleading statement tending to discredit the business, wares or services of a competitor; The seminal C&D case from the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”), S & S Industries Inc. v Rowell[2], established the test for section 7(a) as follows: A false or misleading statement; Tending to discredit the business, wares or services of a competitor; and Resulting damage   Significantly, this SCC decision held that no… [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am by Jeffrey Vicq
  Instead, the Board queried “how any reasonable person would be satisfied that he/she was entitled to file trademark applications for over 18 arguably well known marks for arguably related wares and/or services. [read post]
1 May 2016, 9:09 am
the manners of the tradesman offering one particular ware to the exclusion of all others. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 1:30 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
  Word Mark Click To View 5539152 COMPETITIVE STRUCTURED BLOCK PLAY TSDR 5551465 RANGEXPERTS TSDR 5550999 LIL BUCKS TSDR 5550790 MOVING FORWARD TSDR 5550600 MOVING FORWARD TSDR 5550594 PRECISION PRODUCTS GROUP INC. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 12:10 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
  Word Mark Click To View 5526608 COMPETITIVE STRUCTURED BLOCK PLAY TSDR 5524736 RANGEXPERTS TSDR 5524680 LIL BUCKS TSDR 5524104 MOVING FORWARD TSDR 5524101 MOVING FORWARD TSDR 5526590 PRECISION PRODUCTS GROUP INC. [read post]