Search for: "Michael C. Little"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,783
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
In a morning panel at “The SEC Speaks in 2024” featuring senior members of Corp Fin, Chief Counsel Michael P. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
‘[C]ivil jurisdiction is territorial’: Gosper v Sawyer (1985) 160 CLR 548, 564 (Mason and Deane JJ). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:53 am
State Election Law c. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:44 am
The post Tweets Are Not Enough: Why Combatting Relentless Antisemitism in Canada Requires Real Leadership and Action appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 4:14 am
” There is little ambiguity here. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 3:30 am
In order to appreciate what the UMW did, and the box it put the company in, a little explanation of Rule 14a-4(c)(2) is probably in order. [read post]
The Recalibration of Colonel Brock: D.C. Circuit Ruling for J6 Rioter Could Impact Hundreds of Cases
3 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
However, while there was little question of the validity of the charges against him, U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Michael A. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
It has even spawned a fun little website which counts the number of days Northern Ireland has been without a government. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:00 am
A full copy of the judgment of Justice Michael Green can be found here. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Kirtz, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor goes on a little longer on Murray v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Michael Luttig, who served on the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Wade appears to have relatively little prosecutorial experience (lasting from late Oct. 1998 to Sept. 1999). [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:00 am
Two days later it was China’s turn, with its officials announcing that little Nauru was cutting ties with Taiwan in favour of China. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
See generally Michael Stern, Amarica's Constitutional Crisis: A Kinda Intellectual History of the Office/Officer Controversy, Point of Order (Jan. 5, 2024), <http://tinyurl.com/6xu6x43r> (listing Akhil Amar's former-student protegees, e.g., Professor Kalt, Professor Chafetz, and Benjamin Cassady). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:54 am
I'm reading a NYT "Political Memo" by Michael C. [read post]
