Search for: "Non-Individual Defendants-Class II-d"
Results 21 - 40
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
Defendants' unfettered access to the entirety of plaintiff's e-mails, subsequently granted them access to private and non-private matters. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
§ 1332(d)(4)(A)(II)(bb). [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm
[B]y allegedly misleading consumers and re-directing them away from non-partner restaurants to partner restaurants, DoorDash allegedly gains at non-partner restaurants’ expense. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:37 am
The case proceeded against the non-settling defendants. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:18 pm
LEXIS 112283 (D. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:06 am
(Query: after Lexmark, can Zeltiq sue individual doctors making claims about Vanquish?) [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
” D’Antuono v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 7:18 pm
The non-U.S. companies increased D&O insurance cost was also the subject of a recent Wall Street Journal article (here). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:48 am
Those who make it into the professions will have normally made a big jump into the middle class, but even in the professions, there are borders that need to be understood, sometimes crossed, sometimes defended or attacked. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Among the many questions that have arisen in the FDIC’s failed bank cases as individual defendants have tried to rely on the protection of the business judgment rule is whether or not the defense protects officers as well as directors (about which refer here) or whether it affords less protection to the directors and officers of banks than it does to corporate officials at other kinds of companies (about which refer here). [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 2:29 pm
Everything from Class D up is sentenced from a grid cell in which the only dispositional option is “A” (active). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 10:20 am
II is a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
These may, however, become part of the prohibited class depending on the result of Bill C-71. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
These may, however, become part of the prohibited class depending on the result of Bill C-71. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:31 pm
Such a position would contradict the very purpose of the DIC trigger (immediate, automatic protection for individual D’s and O’s when the underlying carrier fails to indemnify); and certainly the right of the DIC carrier to pursue subrogation against the non-performing underlying insurer should protect the DIC carrier from any prejudice in this regard. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:25 pm
JBS USA, LLC, No. 8:10-CV-318 (D. [read post]
Guest Post: Halliburton II Price Impact Defenses Can Limit Severity on Deficient Exchange Act Claims
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm
Issuers, and the impact of recent guidance by the 2nd and 7th Circuits on Halliburton II stock price impact defenses at the class certification stage. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
(Halliburton II), 134 S. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:53 pm
As I noted in my analysis of 2015 securities class action lawsuits, not only were non-U.S. companies frequent securities class action targets last year, but they were sued at a greater rate than their representation on the U.S. securities exchanges would suggest. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
It thus becomes clear that the effect of what the 7-22 ILC Class is recommending to the United Nations is to remove the constraints that international law for long imposed on the crime of aggression since the end of World War II and even earlier. [read post]
