Search for: "Norris v. United States Of America"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
Extradition in the public interest would, however, generally be proportionate under Article 8(2) (Norris v Government of the United States of America (No.2) [2010] 2 AC 487). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am
The Government of the United States of America -v- O’Dwyer, Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Read judgment It seems appropriate, on the day when Wikipedia shut down for 24 hours to protest against US anti-piracy legislation, to talk about piracy (in the copyright sense) and what role human rights law has to play in the perpetual battle against it. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Each of them had been viewed thousands or tens of thousands of times by individuals throughout the world, including the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) [2009] UKSC 9; [2010] WLR (D) 52 “It was only if some quite exceptionally compelling feature, or combination of features, was present that interference with the right to family life under art 8(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms consequent upon extradition would be other than proportionate to the objective that extradition served. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
Click to read full article [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Norris v Government of United States of America (No 2) Supreme Court “Only the gravest effects of interference with family life would make extradition disproportionate to the public interest in the prevention of crime. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
Click to read full article [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
In 1993, the Swaps Monitor, an industry newsletter, reported that the derivatives market amounted to a total of US$24 trillion, representing approximately four times the size of America’s domestic product by that time. [3] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
[iii] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product of the United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan and China. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Norris, 1 S. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:21 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless… [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
The agreements are said to have been made outside the United States, in Europe, Mexico and Canada, but to have been given effect in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
R (On The Application of Animal Defenders International) V Secretary of State For Culture, Media and Sport (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 15 (12 March 2008) Norris (Appellant) v Judgments - Government of the United States of America and others (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 16 (12 March 2008) Brit Syndicates Limited for and on behalf of Brit Syndicate 2987 at Lloyd’s for the… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Texas) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Edison Electric Institute (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-653 Case name: Norris v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
The Respondent, United States Attorney General Alberto R. [read post]
