Search for: "Oppenheimer & CO. Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 211
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 5:31 pm by Stoltmann Law
As the judgment of arbitrators and attorneys in securities arbitration faces intense scrutiny, Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The settlement of the wife’s elective share claim does not utterly refute plaintiffs’ allegations of proximate cause because the complaint supports the inference that the settlement was effectively compelled by defendants’ malpractice (see Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 429-430 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Thirsty Moose, Inc., 19 AD3d 721, 722 [3d Dept 2005]; see Saint James’ Episcopal Church v F.O.C.U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm by The White Law Group
  According to a press release on September 13, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a litigated action against Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s presumption that there would be a continuation of the retainer agreement she signed with J&S when Schlesinger moved to MLF is insufficient to raise an issue of fact (See Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484,486 [1 st Dept 2018] citing Pellegrino v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 49 AD3d 94, 99 [1st Dept 2008] [“a party cannot create the relationship based on his or her own beliefs or actions”]; Jane St. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Mark Astarita
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a litigated action against Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:06 am
Dollar Interest Rate Derivatives (CFTC Release)Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor is it dispositive that plaintiffs and the Williams Defendants did not have a retainer agreement with respect to the engagement, given Stone’s explanation of the agreement he had with the Williams Defendants, the advice they gave him, the acts he undertook as part of the Williams Defendants’ engagement, and his reliance on their advice (see Pellegrino v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 49 AD3d 94, 99 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 9:22 am by Silver Law Group
CRD# 1065880) is a former registered broker whose last known employer was Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]