Search for: "People v. Masters (1982)" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Indeed, that is why all witnesses—lay or expert—are called: to get what they know about the case that other people do not. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Sharpe and Patricia McMahon Misconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori Chambers The Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan Swainger My Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006 Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald Fyson The Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale Brawn… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Yet, the NDA Government has not officially communicated to the people why it thought it fit to bring in these twin Ordinances. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  Students who master these materials are more sophisticated consumers of law, may make better students of their first year courses, and better lawyers because from the first they begin to develop the means to overcome the siloing effect of legal education. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  Yes, it was released commercially on the Xerox Star and PERQ workstations in 1982, and I used my first one in 1972 at the National Research Council of Canada. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
The Press Complaints Commission resolved complaints by Ms Jessica Antunes v Evening Standard, and by Joanne Swan v The Sun In the Courts On Monday 16 July 2012, Tugendhat J heard and gave judgment in applications in the case of Crow v Johnson ([2012] EWHC 1982 (QB)) ­– dismissing the libel claim brought by the General Secretary of the RMT against the London Mayor. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm by Peter Tillers
Chadbourn rarely spoke about personal matters to other people. [read post]