Search for: "Play It Again FLA, LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2018, 5:05 am by SHG
Copyright © 2007-2018 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
MGM Domestic Television Distribution, LLC, 39 F.4th 1236 (9th Cir. 2022), the Ninth Circuit agreed with my view (and cited my amicus brief), expressly rejecting a three-year limit on recovery of damages in cases in which the discovery rule applies. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
The jury found that the defendants, Monsanto and Nouryon Chemicals LLC, were not negligent, and that the plaintiff’s use of Roundup was not a factual cause of his lymphoma.[4] Law360 reported that the Kline verdict was the first to follow a ruling on Valentine’s Day, February 14, 2024, which excluded any courtroom reference to the hazard evaluation of Glyphosate by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  Mills was similar to Newman in that the plaintiff once again made baseless allegations about possibly carrying a genetic marker. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This may again be partly a result of the recent number of Ponzi scheme cases that are typically filed on an emergency basis. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
This point again is correct, but the Manual does not come to terms with the challenge often made to what I call the assumption of stochastic risk. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]